Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(work-machines): last inspection date fix #16040

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

thorkellmani
Copy link
Member

@thorkellmani thorkellmani commented Sep 17, 2024

What

  • Display a string if a machine has no inspection date

Why

  • Requested

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added localization support for inspection absence with a new message: 'Óskoðuð'.
  • Enhancements
    • Improved validation for the last inspection date to ensure only valid dates are displayed.
    • Enhanced user feedback by displaying a message when no inspection date is available.
    • Streamlined code in the WorkMachinesOverview component for better readability and maintainability.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Ensured that only defined work machine objects are included in the output, improving data integrity.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve enhancements to the handling of the dateLastInspection property in the WorkMachinesService class, ensuring only valid dates are processed. A new message for localization regarding the absence of inspections is added. The WorkMachinesDetail component now conditionally renders the last inspection date, providing a fallback message if unavailable. Lastly, the WorkMachinesOverview component simplifies the logic for displaying the registration number and last inspection date by removing the generateCardText function in favor of inline implementation.

Changes

Files Change Summary
libs/api/domains/work-machines/src/lib/workMachines.service.ts Enhanced handling of dateLastInspection with validation and filtering of undefined values.
libs/service-portal/assets/src/lib/messages.ts Added a new message sp.work-machines:no-inspection for localization regarding no inspections.
libs/service-portal/assets/src/screens/WorkMachinesDetail/WorkMachinesDetail.tsx Implemented conditional rendering for last inspection date with a fallback message.
libs/service-portal/assets/src/screens/WorkMachinesOverview/WorkMachinesOverview.tsx Removed generateCardText function, replaced with inline logic for displaying inspection date.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: fix/work-machines-inspection-date-fix
Commit report: 1a7babb
Test service: api

✅ 0 Failed, 4 Passed, 0 Skipped, 3.03s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.62%. Comparing base (4e76ba9) to head (f251735).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16040      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.65%   36.62%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        6750     6749       -1     
  Lines      138925   138842      -83     
  Branches    39472    39453      -19     
==========================================
- Hits        50926    50855      -71     
+ Misses      87999    87987      -12     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 14 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4e76ba9...f251735. Read the comment docs.

@thorkellmani thorkellmani added the deploy-feature Deploys features to dev label Sep 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Affected services are: api,service-portal,system-e2e,
Feature deployment of your services will begin shortly. Your feature will be accessible here:
https://fixwork-machines-inspection-date-fix-api-catalogue.dev01.devland.is/api
https://fixwork-machines-inspection-date-fix-beta.dev01.devland.is/
https://fixwork-machines-inspection-date-fix-beta.dev01.devland.is/api
https://fixwork-machines-inspection-date-fix-beta.dev01.devland.is/minarsidur
https://fixwork-machines-inspection-date-fix-beta.dev01.devland.is/samradsgatt

Deployed services: service-portal,api,consultation-portal,web.
Excluded services: ``

@thorkellmani thorkellmani marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2024 14:57
@thorkellmani thorkellmani requested review from a team as code owners September 19, 2024 14:57
@thorkellmani thorkellmani added automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass and removed deploy-feature Deploys features to dev labels Sep 23, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit c5d69fd into main Sep 24, 2024
35 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/work-machines-inspection-date-fix branch September 24, 2024 09:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants