feat(j-s): Create ruling confirmation #15894
Conversation
…is into j-s/confirmed-ruling
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces enhancements to the PDF generation functionality in the judicial system's backend. A new function, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15894 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.80% 36.80% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 6692 6692
Lines 137097 137152 +55
Branches 38971 38992 +21
==========================================
+ Hits 50464 50478 +14
- Misses 86633 86674 +41
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 21205 Passed, 0 Skipped, 18m 4.29s Total Time 🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
185-265: Approve the updated logic inFileServicebut recommend enhancing error handling and logging.The updates to the
FileServiceclass to handle both indictment and ruling categories are well-implemented. However, consider enhancing error handling and logging to ensure robustness and easier troubleshooting in production environments.Consider implementing more comprehensive logging at key decision points within the new logic to aid in debugging and monitoring the system's behavior.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts (6 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (4 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (3)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/index.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Additional comments not posted (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/index.ts (1)
37-37: Approve the renaming but verify usage across the codebase.The renaming of
createConfirmedIndictmenttocreateConfirmedPdfis appropriate given the expanded functionality of the function. However, ensure that all references to the old function name are updated throughout the codebase to prevent any issues.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Renaming successfully verified.
The function
createConfirmedPdfhas been correctly renamed and updated across the codebase. There are no remaining references to the old function namecreateConfirmedIndictment, ensuring consistent functionality.
createConfirmedPdfis defined inconfirmedPdf.ts.- It is correctly exported and used in
file.service.ts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `createConfirmedPdf` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'createConfirmedPdf'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `createConfirmedPdf` in TypeScript files. # Search for the function usage in TypeScript files. rg --type ts -A 5 'createConfirmedPdf'Length of output: 2788
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/formatters/confirmedPdf.ts (1)
333-348: Approve the update tocreateConfirmedPdfbut verify handling of file types.The update to
createConfirmedPdfto handle both indictment and ruling confirmations is well-implemented. Ensure that the function correctly differentiates and handles the two types as expected.Consider adding integration tests to verify that the function behaves correctly when handling different
fileTypeparameters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (4 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Additional comments not posted (4)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/file/file.service.ts (4)
26-26: LGTM!The import statement for
isCompletedCaseis correctly added to support the new functionality related to ruling confirmations.
185-219: LGTM!The modifications to the
confirmIndictmentCaseFilemethod to support both indictment and ruling categories are implemented correctly. The conditional logic for determining the appropriate parameters based on thefile.categoryis sound, and the error handling mechanism is appropriate.The changes follow the existing coding style and conventions and are self-contained within the method, minimizing the impact on other parts of the codebase.
240-265: LGTM!The modifications to the
getCaseFileFromS3method to handle both indictment and ruling categories are implemented correctly. The conditional checks for the case state and the retrieval of the confirmed indictment case object based on thefile.categoryare logically sound.The changes are consistent with the modifications made in the
confirmIndictmentCaseFilemethod and follow the existing coding style and conventions. The impact on other parts of the codebase is minimal, as the changes are localized within the method.
401-404: LGTM!The additional condition for the
RULINGcategory in thegetCaseFileSignedUrlFromS3method is implemented correctly. It checks if thefile.categoryisRULINGand if the case is completed, which is consistent with the changes made in other parts of the code.The changes follow the existing coding style and conventions and are localized within the method, minimizing the impact on other parts of the codebase.
* Checkpoint * Cleanup * Rename * Refactor * Remove unused code * Fix lint * Create confirmed ruling * Create confirmed ruling * Make confirmation smaller * Make confirmation smaller * Use correct date * Merge * Refactor * Refactor * Cleanup * Cleanup * Check for completed cases --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Create ruling confirmation
Asana
What
Add a confirmation stamp on rulings in S-cases when a case is completed.
Screenshots / Gifs
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Modifications
Refactor