fix(j-s): Court Arrangements #15406
fix(j-s): Court Arrangements #15406
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes focus on improving the handling and validation of court dates within various components and functions. Key adjustments include initializing Changes
Tip Early access features: enabledWe are currently testing the following features in early access:
Note:
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 73 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 72 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (2) |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #15406 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 37.05% 37.06% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 6541 6541
Lines 133265 133226 -39
Branches 38197 38172 -25
==========================================
Hits 49376 49376
+ Misses 83889 83850 -39
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/InvestigationCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/CourtRecord/CourtRecord.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.ts (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (7)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/InvestigationCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/CourtRecord/CourtRecord.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Learnings (3)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (1)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.ts (1)
Learnt from: gudjong PR: island-is/island.is#15241 File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/dto/updateDefendant.dto.ts:87-90 Timestamp: 2024-06-14T15:09:02.068Z Learning: In some parts of the codebase, `verdictViewDate` is treated as a string, not a Date object, specifically in `updateDefendant.input.ts`, `defendant.model.ts`, and `case.transformer.ts`.apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (1)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
Biome
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx
[error] 80-85: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 80-83: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.ts
[error] 44-44: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
Additional comments not posted (9)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx (3)
49-62: Ensure correct handling of court date changes.The useEffect hook correctly updates the court date state based on the working case. Verify if the dependencies are correctly set to avoid unnecessary re-renders.
159-162: Ensure correct handling of court room changes.The onChange handler correctly updates the court room state and calls
handleCourtRoomChange. Verify if the functionhandleCourtRoomChangeis correctly implemented.
135-139: Verify the state initialization forcourtRoom.The
courtRoomstate is initialized based oncourtDate.location. Ensure that this change is consistent with the expected structure ofDateLog.Verification successful
The state initialization for
courtRoomis consistent with the structure ofDateLog.
- The
DateLoginterface defines an optionallocationproperty, which aligns with the use ofcourtDate?.locationin theCourtArrangementscomponent.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure of DateLog and its initialization. # Test: Check if DateLog is defined and consistent with the courtRoom initialization. rg --type ts 'interface DateLog'Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the structure of the DateLog interface to verify the presence of the location property. # Extract the definition of the DateLog interface. rg --type ts --multiline 'interface DateLog \{[^}]*\}' apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/internal/internalCase.response.tsLength of output: 265
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx (1)
132-132: Verify the parameter update.The
courtDateparameter is updated toworkingCase.arraignmentDate. Ensure that this change is consistent with the expected structure ofDateLog.Verification successful
Verify the parameter update.
The
courtDateparameter is updated toworkingCase.arraignmentDate, which is consistent with theDateLogstructure. This change aligns with the expected properties used inHearingArrangements.
workingCase.arraignmentDateis defined asDateLog, which includes properties such asdateandlocation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure of DateLog and its usage in validation functions. # Test: Check if DateLog is defined and consistent with the parameter update. rg --type ts 'interface DateLog'Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Fetch the definition of DateLog interface and its properties. # Extract the definition of DateLog interface. rg --type ts 'interface DateLog' -A 10 # Check the usage of courtDate in HearingArrangements component. rg --type ts 'courtDate' apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsxLength of output: 1238
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure of workingCase to ensure arraignmentDate aligns with DateLog.date. # Check the definition of workingCase and its properties. rg --type ts 'interface WorkingCase' -A 20Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the file containing the definition of WorkingCase and examine its properties. # Locate the file containing the definition of WorkingCase. fd 'WorkingCase.ts' # Extract the definition of WorkingCase and its properties. rg --type ts 'interface WorkingCase' -A 20 $(fd 'WorkingCase.ts')Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search for the definition of WorkingCase and examine its properties. # Search for the definition of WorkingCase across all TypeScript files. rg --type ts 'interface WorkingCase' -A 20Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition and context of arraignmentDate within TypeScript files. # Search for arraignmentDate across all TypeScript files. rg --type ts 'arraignmentDate'Length of output: 14487
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (1)
103-103: Verify the parameter update.The
courtDateparameter is updated toworkingCase.arraignmentDate. Ensure that this change is consistent with the expected structure ofDateLog.Verification successful
Verification of parameter update in
isSubpoenaStepValidfunctionThe
isSubpoenaStepValidfunction correctly uses thearraignmentDateparameter, which matches the expected structure ofDateLog. The function validates thedateandlocationfields fromarraignmentDateorworkingCase.arraignmentDateand ensures all defendants have asubpoenaType.
Function Implementation:
export const isSubpoenaStepValid = ( workingCase: Case, arraignmentDate?: DateLog, ): boolean => { return ( validate([ [ arraignmentDate ? arraignmentDate.date : workingCase.arraignmentDate?.date, ['empty', 'date-format'], ], [ arraignmentDate ? arraignmentDate.location : workingCase.arraignmentDate?.location, ['empty'], ], ]).isValid && Boolean( workingCase.defendants?.every((defendant) => defendant.subpoenaType), ) ) }Validation Logic:
- The function checks if
arraignmentDateis provided; if not, it falls back toworkingCase.arraignmentDate.- It validates the
dateandlocationfields to ensure they are not empty and the date is in the correct format.- It checks that all defendants have a
subpoenaType.The parameter update to
workingCase.arraignmentDateis consistent with the expected structure ofDateLog.
- Files Reviewed:
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsxapps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure of DateLog and its usage in validation functions. # Test: Check if DateLog is defined and consistent with the parameter update. rg --type ts 'interface DateLog'Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the `DateLog` interface definition and check the implementation of `isSubpoenaStepValid`. # Display the `DateLog` interface definition. rg --type ts --context 5 'interface DateLog' apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/internal/internalCase.response.ts # Search for the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function implementation. ast-grep --lang ts --pattern 'function isSubpoenaStepValid($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 435
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function implementation using `rg`. # Search for the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function definition. rg --type ts 'function isSubpoenaStepValid'Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Use `ast-grep` to search for all function definitions and locate `isSubpoenaStepValid`. # Search for all function definitions and locate `isSubpoenaStepValid`. ast-grep --lang ts --pattern 'function $_($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 437946
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Use `rg` to search for the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function usage across the codebase. # Search for the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function usage. rg 'isSubpoenaStepValid'Length of output: 511
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function implementation in `apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.ts`. # Display the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function implementation. ast-grep --lang ts --pattern 'export const isSubpoenaStepValid = ($_) => { $$$ }' apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.tsLength of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Use `rg` to search for the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function definition in `apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.ts`. # Search for the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function definition. rg 'isSubpoenaStepValid' apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.tsLength of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the full implementation of the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function from `apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.ts`. # Display the full implementation of the `isSubpoenaStepValid` function. sed -n '/export const isSubpoenaStepValid = (/,/^}/p' apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.tsLength of output: 653
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/InvestigationCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx (1)
113-113: Verify the parameter update.The
courtDateparameter is updated toworkingCase.arraignmentDate. Ensure that this change is consistent with the expected structure ofDateLog.Verification successful
Verify the parameter update.
The
courtDateparameter is consistently assigned the value ofworkingCase.arraignmentDate, which aligns with the expected structure and usage within theHearingArrangementscomponent. TheworkingCaseobject, including itsarraignmentDateproperty, is correctly utilized throughout the component.
- The
workingCaseobject is defined and used extensively in the codebase, particularly in theHearingArrangementscomponent.- The
arraignmentDateproperty of theworkingCaseobject is correctly assigned tocourtDate.There are no inconsistencies found with the parameter update.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure of DateLog and its usage in validation functions. # Test: Check if DateLog is defined and consistent with the parameter update. rg --type ts 'interface DateLog'Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the definition of the DateLog interface rg --type ts --context 10 'interface DateLog' apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/internal/internalCase.response.ts # Search for the usage of DateLog within the HearingArrangements component rg --type ts 'DateLog' apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/InvestigationCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsxLength of output: 608
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of courtDate within the HearingArrangements component rg --type ts 'courtDate' apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/InvestigationCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsxLength of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of workingCase and its arraignmentDate property rg --type ts 'workingCase' apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/InvestigationCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsxLength of output: 2114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of workingCase and its properties, specifically focusing on arraignmentDate rg --type ts 'interface.*Case' apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/InvestigationCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsxLength of output: 136
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of Case interface or type in the entire project rg --type ts 'interface.*Case|type.*Case'Length of output: 85570
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of Case interface or type in the apps/judicial-system/web/src directory rg --type ts 'interface.*Case|type.*Case' apps/judicial-system/web/srcLength of output: 22668
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of workingCase and its arraignmentDate property in the apps/judicial-system/web/src directory rg --type ts 'workingCase' apps/judicial-system/web/srcLength of output: 355408
apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/validate.ts (1)
337-347: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
isCourtHearingArrangementsStepValidRCmatch the new signature.apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/CourtRecord/CourtRecord.tsx (1)
493-504: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (1)
382-382: Verify the prop type ofcourtDateinCourtArrangements.Ensure that the
courtDateprop in theCourtArrangementscomponent is of the expected type.Verification successful
Verify the prop type of
courtDateinCourtArrangements.The
courtDateprop in theCourtArrangementscomponent is of typeDateLog | null. This confirms that the prop type is correctly defined.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx, lines 3-8Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the prop type of `courtDate` in `CourtArrangements`. # Test: Search for the `CourtArrangements` component definition. Expect: `courtDate` prop of type `DateLog`. rg --type js --type ts --type tsx $'CourtArrangements'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the prop type of `courtDate` in `CourtArrangements`. # Test: Search for the `CourtArrangements` component definition and check the `courtDate` prop type. rg --type js --type ts --type typescript 'CourtArrangements'Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the prop type of `courtDate` in `CourtArrangements`. # Test: Search for the `CourtArrangements` component definition and check the `courtDate` prop type. rg --type js --type ts --type tsx 'CourtArrangements'Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the prop type of `courtDate` in `CourtArrangements`. # Test: Search for the `CourtArrangements` component definition and check the `courtDate` prop type. rg --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type tsx 'CourtArrangements'Length of output: 2853
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the prop type of `courtDate` in `CourtArrangements`. # Extract the `CourtArrangements` component definition and its props from the `CourtArrangements.tsx` file. rg --multiline --multiline-dotall --type tsx 'export const CourtArrangements: FC<Props>' apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsxLength of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the prop type of `courtDate` in `CourtArrangements`. # Extract the `CourtArrangements` component definition and its props from the `CourtArrangements.tsx` file. rg --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type tsx 'CourtArrangements' -A 20 apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsxLength of output: 2399
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/CourtArrangements/CourtArrangements.tsx
...cial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…fill arraignment date
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/InvestigationCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/InvestigationCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/RestrictionCase/HearingArrangements/HearingArrangements.tsx
* Fixes court arrangement * Removes redundant null check * Fixes initialization when requested court date should be used to autofill arraignment date --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Court Arrangements
Böggur í date input á þingfestingar skjá/fyrirkalls skjá
What
Why
Screenshots / Gifs
Screen.Recording.2024-07-01.at.18.51.42.mov
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
courtEndTimein CourtRecord component.Refactor
arraignmentDateinstead ofcourtDatefor better consistency.DateLogtype appropriately.