Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2023. It is now read-only.

Sprint: Solidify IPLD #343

Closed
23 of 49 tasks
flyingzumwalt opened this issue Jan 16, 2017 · 16 comments
Closed
23 of 49 tasks

Sprint: Solidify IPLD #343

flyingzumwalt opened this issue Jan 16, 2017 · 16 comments
Assignees

Comments

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor

flyingzumwalt commented Jan 16, 2017

Objectives

Out of the scope of this sprint:

  • Ship ipld.io

Team for this Sprint:

Dependencies

@flyingzumwalt
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nicola is also on this sprint -- couldn't add him as an assignee because he wasn't a collaborator on this repo yet (waiting for confirmation of invite)

@nicola
Copy link
Member

nicola commented Jan 21, 2017

Was "IPLD Selector Spec" really part of this sprint?
I happen to be doing work on this in the past few days, I thought we did not consider it

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

IPLD Selector Spec, get bitswap to use it

I don't know how they appeared in the list.. I didn't have any discussion that it would be a goal of the sprint. Yet, we might do a lot of work or even push ourselves to do it.

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@nicola did you remove yourself from this Sprint?

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

Prep session doodle http://doodle.com/poll/yk6xu87q3xxrqyhk

@whyrusleeping @nicola please add your availabilities.

@nicola
Copy link
Member

nicola commented Jan 24, 2017

@diasdavid I will be in Palo Alto (sorry for the bad timing)

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

@diasdavid I don't think i can make any of those times, The most likely is 10am friday morning (the rest of the times are all too early in the morning) but i don't have more than an hour of availability there.

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@whyrusleeping 9am doesn't work for you? What about right after the all hands? Any proposed solution?

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

Added another hour (yours 10pm Thursday) http://beta.doodle.com/poll/yk6xu87q3xxrqyhk @nicola @whyrusleeping

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

daviddias commented Jan 30, 2017

David's check-in Mon 30

  • Clean up last things from last sprint
  • Doctor appt
  • Update dag-cbor to use tags
  • Revisit js-ipfs DAG API (finish get + put + delete)

@nicola
Copy link
Member

nicola commented Jan 30, 2017

Nicola's check-in Mon 30

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

daviddias commented Jan 31, 2017

David's check-in Tue 31

Update from yesterday:

  • Didn't have time to go through things as much as I wanted, but did a good catch up with Kumavis on prep for DAppHackathon and expanded the list of tasks here to be more discriptive

Today:

  • Upgrade dag-cbor to use tags
  • Break the DAG API into 3 different PR (basics, resolve and workbench)
  • DAG API basics
    • interface definition
    • js-ipfs impl
    • js-ipfs-api impl
  • Update Block API to understand how to put blocks from other types
    • interface
    • js-ipfs impl
    • js-ipfs-api impl

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

daviddias commented Jan 31, 2017

@whyrusleeping need your input (urgent) on https://github.com/ipfs/interface-ipfs-core/issues/81

Also, can I get those 'test graphs'?

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@whyrusleeping, @Gozala is trying to resolve base16 encoded values in CIDv1, but without success, I also tried and no go, what are we forgetting here?

From IRC

21:58 <gozala> daviddias: Ping!
21:58 <gozala> daviddias: I’ve tried to use [email protected] but still don’t seem to get it to do what I wanted
21:59 <gozala> daviddias: here is the snippet of code https://runkit.com/gozala/58645fba7240320014993626
21:59 <gozala> daviddias: I’m essentially trying to take this address http://localhost:8080/ipfs/QmPZ9gcCEpqKTo6aq61g2nXGUhM4iCL3ewB6LDXZCtioEB
22:00 <gozala> and transcode it to base 16 to have all lower case
22:00 <gozala> http://localhost:8080/ipfs/f1701220120f6af601d46e10b2d2e11ed71c55d25f3042c22501e41d1246e7a1e9d3d8ec
22:01 <gozala> but when I do so go-ipfs 0.4.4 fails to resolve path with: not a key error

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

@daviddias daviddias removed the Week 5 label Jul 3, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants