-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Strange command behaviors #1350
Comments
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 03:21:26PM -0700, Dylan Powers wrote:
‘ipfs name resolve …’ is currently just for name entries using the DHT $ ipfs resolve /ipns/ But I just fixed a problem with non-recursive resolution in #1351 |
I didn't realize |
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:35:47PM -0700, Dylan Powers wrote:
It works for me. Without a local daemon: $ ipfs --debug resolve --recursive /ipns/tremily.us And with a daemon (in which case the guts happen on the daemon): $ ipfs --debug resolve --recursive /ipns/tremily.us |
I get the following when running offline:
|
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:24:16PM -0700, Dylan Powers wrote:
That's showing the all-protocol resolver iterating through available $ ipfs --debug dns tremily.us Or a trace of the current master (which errors out but shows a good $ ipfs --debug dns tremily.us If neither of those are working for you, can you post whatever your $ dig tremily.us TXT +short And if that looks reasonable, I'd try running the namesys tests: $ cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/namesys/ |
Can we get an update on the issue found? Is it still happening on 0.3.10 and 0.4.0? Thx |
Yes, it still happening on current 0.4.4. And due to this issue, DNS lookup redirect in IPFS Firefox addon looks broken with IPNS links (as described in issue referenced above). |
|
The resolution logic has changed significantly since this issue was last touched and I can't reproduce. Feel free to reopen/comment if this is still an issue in the latest release. |
I'm getting a number of strange command behaviors. One of them being
ipfs name resolve <url>
giving an error of:Error: multihash too short. must be > 3 bytes
when it worked fine on older versions. I'm also used to my daemon running as a system user and having my ipfs commands run through it. I can no longer do that. Was this done on purpose? Are ipfs commands no longer being routed through the daemon's http api server?Another command nitpick is when ipfs cat is run "offline" I get an error of:
Error: blockstore: block not found
when I would expect the old behavior of being told the daemon is offline.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: