Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Link to DOAP (or now SPDX?) ontology instead of defining own fields for related Software #23

Open
moedn opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Link to DOAP (or now SPDX?) ontology instead of defining own fields for related Software #23

moedn opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request workable Ready to be worked on

Comments

@moedn
Copy link

moedn commented Feb 22, 2022

…as recommended by OntoCommons :)

related resources:
@hoijui
Copy link
Collaborator

hoijui commented Feb 24, 2022

good idea! +1
sadly though, it looks like the maintainer is inactive since.. 2 years or so.
I made an issue about that.

@hoijui hoijui mentioned this issue May 6, 2024
Closed
2 tasks
@hoijui hoijui transferred this issue from OPEN-NEXT/OKH-LOSH May 30, 2024
@hoijui
Copy link
Collaborator

hoijui commented Jun 16, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The maintainer is active again!
nagging helped! :-)

NOTE
In some place he also mentioned, that the SPDX ontology mostly deprecates DOAP (Description of a Project), so we should have a look into that.

@hoijui hoijui changed the title Link to DOAP ontology instead of defining own fields for related Software Link to DOAP (or now SPDX?) ontology instead of defining own fields for related Software Jun 16, 2024
@hoijui hoijui added enhancement New feature or request workable Ready to be worked on labels Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request workable Ready to be worked on
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@hoijui @moedn