doc: add NAN WG #1226
Merged
doc: add NAN WG #1226
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
+1 But I like more general Working Group name. NAN stands for |
|
Good call @yosuke-furukawa, I've changed it to the "Addon API Working Group" but am open to alternative suggestions. |
|
Should this be tc-agenda? I think the TC would ratify this, right? |
|
I think this can be closed now? The WG was unanimously accepted in Wednesday's TC meeting. |
|
I think it needs to be rebased, but it should be merged. |
PR-URL: nodejs#1226 Reviewed-By: Yosuke Furukawa <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: TC
|
landed @ 12e51d5 |
|
please welcome the new @iojs/addon-api team |
|
\o/ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposing a NAN Working Group and the move of the nan and node-addon-examples (to be renamed "addon-examples") repos to the iojs org.
Corresponding proposal to the NAN owners is here, note that it's already run as an open project in a similar model to io.js so this needs to be agreed upon there too. Initial WG members would be those listed on the NAN README although that's not quite final because there's a couple of people who may be removed due to inactivity (it'll be their choice).