-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
Evangelism: Weekly Update Feb 27th #4
Comments
jsdom requires io.js in 4.0.0: https://github.com/tmpvar/jsdom/blob/master/Changelog.md#400 |
Wallby.js version 1.0 supports io.js: http://dm.gl/2015/02/23/wallaby-version-one/ |
https://twitter.com/maciejmalecki/status/569629100215816192 |
|
@mikeal @bnb I actually work for a company that makes social mention monitoring platform. Those 2 ^^ & jsdom news seems to be trending tweets over the weekend. In addition to us searching the web, maybe tweet from @official_iojs "if your project support io.js, let us know and we'll include in our weekly" or something?? |
@kosamari That's a good idea. Should it be a weekly reminder? Monthly? Or just one time? |
Microsoft published documentation that demonstrates how to run io.js on Azure: http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/web-sites-nodejs-iojs/ |
Version 2.2.1 of Firebase web/Node.js client supports io.js. |
semaphore support https://twitter.com/semaphoreapp/status/570987355005431809 |
Floobits moves to io.js https://news.floobits.com/2015/02/23/on-moving-to-io.js/ |
Cross linking with the relevant website issue: nodejs/iojs.org#241 |
1.4.1 https://github.com/iojs/io.js/blob/v1.x/CHANGELOG.md io.js roadmap officially merged https://github.com/iojs/io.js/blob/v1.x/ROADMAP.md established tracing, roadmap, evangelism and i18n working group charters nodejs/node@ae7a233 roadmap slides ready for translators and speakers nodejs/roadmap#18 reconciliation proposal nodejs/node#978 |
What time is this due to go out? I have some very interesting news I think I can share on behalf of build. Just not at this instant. |
in like 12 - 16 hours :) |
@rvagg You should have time to get it done. As Mikeal said, it'll be in a while. Looking forward to your news. |
io.js japenese blog is up http://blog.iojs.jp/ |
Here is Chinese blog http://cn.iojs.org/ |
Writing this now.
|
@rvagg I'm writing it now. Will you be able to get that update to us sometime soon? |
maybe change Or, like https://medium.com/node-js-javascript/io-js-week-of-february-20th-2015-48486615980, a |
io.js 1.4.1 ReleaseNote: version 1.4.0 was tagged and built but not released. A libuv bug was discovered in the process so the release was aborted. We have jumped to 1.4.1 to avoid confusion. Notable changes
io.js Updates
|
@bnb I updated the description with your content. |
I'd like to re-word the Reconciliation post text to stick with just the facts.
|
io.js TC/WG meetings
|
I'm gonna stick the Roadmap Slides Review in to the rest of the update so that we don't have a section with only one item |
@mikeal Okay, no problem. Update the page, as I just updated the first post. |
/cc @iojs/build who I don't think I've shared this with yet because it's been a private conversation so far. I don't know if this goes with the style of what you're publishing but here's my prose: ARM contacted Rod Vagg as representative of the io.js Build Working Group to offer their support to the io.js project. ARM and their hardware partners are on track to make ARMv8 a viable server platform and the nimble nature of server-side JavaScript make it a perfect fit. Unfortunately, there is little they can do with the current Node.js codebase given its old V8 version, which does not include proper support for ARMv8 hardware. Since ARMv8 is being targeted at mobile device manufacturers, newer versions of V8 already have good support. Because of its pivotal role in Android, io.js is perfectly suited to track that support and even contribute to it given our new relationships with the V8 team. |
@rvagg I made a few nit-picky changes to it to make it 100% structurally sound. I've highlighted those with Markdown's inline code styling below. Would you look at the inline code bits below and make sure everything seems right to you? I only made a few word changes, but I want to make sure you're still satisfied with the meaning of it. I completely understand if you don't have the time and/or desire to go through it--if that's the case, just let me know and I'll have another Evangelism team member look it over. ARM contacted Rod Vagg as representative of the io.js Build Working Group to offer their support to the io.js project. ARM and their hardware partners are on track to make ARMv8 a viable server platform and the nimble nature of server-side JavaScript make it a perfect fit Unfortunately, there is little From the beginning of the io.js project, Rod has championed the role of ARM for io.js, for IoT, hobbyist, and server use. We already have ARMv6 builds The build team is in the process of being given access to the Linaro ARMv8 Server Cluster for integration with the io.js CI platform TL;DR io.js + ARMv8 FTW, this is very exciting and having ARM reach out to us is just another example of the amazing traction io.js has garnered in such a short amount of time and a validation of our development and governance model. |
@bnb that's fine, but perhaps revisit the end of the first paragraph, not sure repeating "ARMv8" is optimal there but I'll leave the end decision to you. Cheers. |
@rvagg Thanks for noticing that. Mikeal edited it a bit more, and it's been included in the post at the top. Thanks for sharing it with us--it's really awesome. |
Just went over it again, LGTM. |
Published https://medium.com/node-js-javascript/io-js-week-of-february-17th-9422a589302a Ready for translations :) |
@mikeal must be february 27th, not 17th. But who cares.. |
Yes, it's Feb 27th 📅 |
@mikeal - is there a place for translations of this to go? If the EN-US is posted to medium.com/nodej-js-javascript, then where should the translations reside? |
@rosskukulinski we leave that up to each community and encourage them to use whatever service they think will reach the most people in their community :) |
ugh, this wasn't intended but:
should probably be
ARM want this to be seen as a viable server platform (as do we frankly) rather than "targeting mobile". |
cool, i'll update the medium post if someone else can update here. |
Updated in rendered and template parts of the first post. |
@mikeal is there a way to get the full markdown version, that will be easier for translation groups |
@julianduque look at the bottom of the Issue description :) |
@julianduque As Mikeal said, it's at the bottom. It should be like that for every Weekly Update, and they should be in |
io.js 1.4.1 Release
Note: version 1.4.0 was tagged and built but not released. A libuv bug was discovered in the process so the release was aborted. We have jumped to 1.4.1 to avoid confusion.
Notable changes
'unhandledRejection'
event is now emitted onprocess
whenever aPromise
is rejected and no error handler is attached to thePromise
within a turn of the event loop. A'rejectionHandled'
event is now emitted whenever aPromise
was rejected and an error handler was attached to it later than after an event loop turn. #758 (Petka Antonov)tls.connect()
#926 (Fedor Indutny)'abort'
event emitted when ahttp.ClientRequest
is aborted by the client. #945 (Evan Lucas)npm@3
. See npm CHANGELOG.md for details. Summary:peerDependency
behavior is changing and add a note to the docs.engineStrict
inpackage.json
will be going away in the next major version of npm (coming soon!)ARM offers support for io.js on ARMv8
ARM contacted Rod Vagg, lead of the io.js Build Working Group, to offer their support to the io.js project. ARM and their hardware partners are on track to make ARMv8 a viable server platform and the nimble nature of server-side JavaScript make it a perfect fit to run on the new ARM.
Since ARMv8 is already being adopted by mobile device manufacturers, newer versions of V8 already have good support. Because of V8's pivotal role in Android, io.js is perfectly suited to track that support, and even contribute to it given our new relationships with the V8 team.
From the beginning of the io.js project, Rod has championed the role of ARM for io.js, for IoT, hobbyist, and server use. We already have ARMv6 builds of each release for devices such as Raspberry Pi. and ARMv7 builds for many more popular devices (including the Online Labs ARM-based cloud platform, who have also offered help to io.js). ARMv8 is the logical extension of this, but also has exciting potential for server-side applications, particularly given the new 64-bit support.
The build team is in the process of being given access to the Linaro ARMv8 Server Cluster for integration with the io.js CI platform, which should eventually lead to regular ARMv8 binary releases.
Community Updates
--harmony
flag, and because they felt changes from 0.10.0 to 0.12.0 weren't very big.io.js Support Added
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: