Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define standard: predictions #67

Open
terryf82 opened this issue Mar 4, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Define standard: predictions #67

terryf82 opened this issue Mar 4, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@terryf82
Copy link
Collaborator

terryf82 commented Mar 4, 2018

We need to define an initial standard for predictions the project generates, that resolves:

  • required / optional attributes of a prediction, including data typing

  • temporal aspect: previously we've talked about converting the dates for weekly predictions from a 1-53 week identifier to an epoch timestamp (e.g. the first second of the week) to ensure that we build with the capability to handle more than one year

@terryf82
Copy link
Collaborator Author

terryf82 commented Mar 5, 2018

@bpben is this the right place to talk about outputting data on how a prediction is reached?

I think one fundamental aspect of generating predictions that cities would be willing to action is being able to explain how they were reached (e.g contributing factors and their relative weight). What are your thoughts on the best way to output this?

@j-t-t

@bpben
Copy link
Collaborator

bpben commented Mar 6, 2018

Ahh, good point. I think I'd like to standardize the pipeline first. Then we can see how data is coming in and adjust accordingly.

@terryf82
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bpben based on this morning's meeting it seems like we're pushing this back to a future release (possibly v2) to allow us to clear up some more pressing jobs first?

@terryf82
Copy link
Collaborator Author

terryf82 commented Jan 9, 2019

@bpben this one has been around for a long time now, do we want to have a go at defining a standards yet or still not enough value?

@bpben
Copy link
Collaborator

bpben commented Aug 21, 2023

I do want to take this up, will add to the map - should be part of revamping the model pipeline

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants