Refactor event store to use migration mechanism

[sfauvel]

Content

This PR implement migration mechanism for the event_store module.
The event_store module is reorganized to embedded a database folder with the same structure than the mithril-aggregator::database one.
The WAL is activated on the event_store connection

Pre-submit checklist

• Branch
  • Tests are provided (if possible)
  • Crates versions are updated (if relevant)
  • CHANGELOG file is updated (if relevant)
  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense
  • Key commits have useful messages
• PR
  • No clippy warnings in the CI
  • Self-reviewed the diff
  • Useful pull request description
  • Reviewer requested
• Documentation
  • Update README file (if relevant)
  • Update documentation website (if relevant)
  • Add dev blog post (if relevant)

Comments

We do not create a folder for repository, record and query but just a file because there is only one structure in each one.
If we have to add other structure, we can create this directory later transparently for the other modules.

Issue(s)

Relates to #2023

[github-actions]

Test Results

    4 files  ±0     55 suites  ±0   10m 25s ⏱️ ±0s
1 397 tests +2  1 397 ✅ +2  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 611 runs  +2  1 611 ✅ +2  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9a7bf92. ± Comparison against base commit 63e1204.

This pull request removes 3 and adds 5 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

mithril-aggregator ‑ event_store::event::tests::can_persist_event
mithril-aggregator ‑ event_store::event::tests::event_projection
mithril-aggregator ‑ event_store::event::tests::provider_sql

mithril-aggregator ‑ event_store::database::query::tests::build_a_json_for_content_field_with_content_and_headers
mithril-aggregator ‑ event_store::database::query::tests::provider_sql
mithril-aggregator ‑ event_store::database::record::tests::event_projection
mithril-aggregator ‑ event_store::database::repository::tests::can_persist_event
mithril-aggregator ‑ event_store::database::repository::tests::migration_executed_running_database

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[jpraynaud]

LGTM 👍

[Alenar]

LGTM

[dlachaume]

LGTM 👍

[dlachaume]

This error message was already present before, but I find the phrasing a bit strange with the use of 'I'. What do you think?

Suggested change

	"No record from the database after I saved event message {log_message:?}"
	"No record from the database after saving event message {log_message:?}"

[sfauvel]

Done