Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Get AcceptedConnectionsLimit from the configuration #4902

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 17, 2023

Conversation

coot
Copy link
Contributor

@coot coot commented Feb 21, 2023

No description provided.

@coot coot force-pushed the coot/configurable-accepted-connections-limit branch from 3697fd0 to 018f0f7 Compare February 21, 2023 09:20
Copy link
Contributor

@Jimbo4350 Jimbo4350 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small comment and please squash the commits

cardano-node/ChangeLog.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@coot coot requested a review from Jimbo4350 March 2, 2023 07:55
@coot coot dismissed Jimbo4350’s stale review March 2, 2023 07:56

The requested change was added.

@coot coot force-pushed the coot/configurable-accepted-connections-limit branch from 3a99ac9 to baf7783 Compare March 6, 2023 16:45
@coot coot enabled auto-merge March 9, 2023 10:05
@coot coot disabled auto-merge March 9, 2023 10:06
@coot coot force-pushed the coot/configurable-accepted-connections-limit branch from baf7783 to 7895628 Compare March 9, 2023 10:22
@coot coot force-pushed the coot/configurable-accepted-connections-limit branch from 7895628 to 66b33d7 Compare March 10, 2023 11:15
@coot coot added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 17, 2023
@coot coot merged commit 0345419 into master Mar 17, 2023
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot deleted the coot/configurable-accepted-connections-limit branch March 17, 2023 16:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants