Transaction build in any alonzo era when on babbage testnet #4135

newhoggy · 2022-07-05T10:30:51Z

Resolves #3909 for building Alonzo transactions from Babbage era

newhoggy · 2022-07-05T12:59:44Z

$ CARDANO_NODE_SOCKET_PATH=example/main.sock cardano-cli query utxo --testnet-magic 42 --address $(cardano-cli address build --testnet-magic 42 --payment-verification-key-file example/utxo-keys/utxo1.vkey)
                           TxHash                                 TxIx        Amount
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4e11a1dee6c6acceb54471be4cc378d3f57fe803bcff405b7527b967c94210b6     0        300000000000 lovelace + TxOutDatumNone

$ cardano-cli address build --testnet-magic 42 --payment-verification-key-file example/utxo-keys/utxo1.vkey
addr_test1vrlwhj4x3e6lyfj5d4pz9rn7n0sshfdf53zvlydjagsp08g686tth

$ cardano-cli transaction build \
  --alonzo-era \
  --testnet-magic 42 \
  --change-address 'addr_test1vrlwhj4x3e6lyfj5d4pz9rn7n0sshfdf53zvlydjagsp08g686tth' \
  --tx-in '4e11a1dee6c6acceb54471be4cc378d3f57fe803bcff405b7527b967c94210b6#0' \
  --tx-out 'addr_test1vrlwhj4x3e6lyfj5d4pz9rn7n0sshfdf53zvlydjagsp08g686tth+1000000' \
  --out-file tx.body

Estimated transaction fee: Lovelace 165545

$ cat tx.body
{
    "type": "TxBodyAlonzo",
    "description": "",
    "cborHex": "86a300818258204e11a1dee6c6acceb54471be4cc378d3f57fe803bcff405b7527b967c94210b600018282581d60feebcaa68e75f226546d42228e7e9be10ba5a9a444cf91b2ea20179d1b00000045d952ef1782581d60feebcaa68e75f226546d42228e7e9be10ba5a9a444cf91b2ea20179d1a000f4240021a000286a99fff8080f5f6"
}

$ CARDANO_NODE_SOCKET_PATH=example/main.sock cardano-cli transaction sign --tx-body-file tx.body --signing-key-file example/utxo-keys/utxo1.skey --out
-file tx.body.signed

$ CARDANO_NODE_SOCKET_PATH=example/main.sock cardano-cli transaction submit --tx-file tx.body.signed --testnet-magic 42
Transaction successfully submitted.

Jimbo4350

Great work 👍 . I do have a suggestion for an improvement because I believe the Summon type class is unnecessary. If you look closely, the summon type class is the same as as all of the supportedInEra functions:

3d8ff42

^ I have created a branch above. Feel free to cherry pick.

What are we trying to achieve with EraCast? We want to see if a particular type is supported in another era and if it is we can convert it. We have a slew of isSupportedInEra functions. If we add the era that we want our type to be converted to, we can simply reuse this functionality in the EraCast instances and we can do away with the Summon type class.

I would also like to add an error type to the EraCast. I have it defaulted to String but this is atrocious. We can do better however this is complicated by some of the supportedInEra functions returning a Maybe and some returning an Either. I would suggest a datatype that contains the offending type and the era we are translating to. Propagate this upwards to the cli and in the cli we can include the era we are translating from. We can then render "X is supported in eraA but not eraB" or something like that.

cardano-cli/src/Cardano/CLI/Shelley/Run/Transaction.hs

Review comments

Jimbo4350

Almost there, one further suggestion

0a12e83

I think this is a better type for EraCastError:

data EraCastError = forall toEra thing.
  ( IsCardanoEra toEra
  , Show thing
  ) =>
    EraCastError
    { typeName :: thing
    , toEra :: CardanoEra toEra
    }

Why? You get more information for free. E.g 0a12e83#diff-d2926b61bd606dc6c5e96c7607110c554a255cf353852708e0ecbbcc3ccbc4f0L1442
Previously all you were given was that you were trying to convert a ReferenceScript script from one era to another. You have to perform some additional gymnastics to figure out which era you were converting from. However, if you propagate the data constructor and show the offending data, it tells you exactly which reference script you were trying to convert and gives you the ReferenceTxInsScriptsInlineDatumsSupportedInEra era type as well.

data ReferenceTxInsScriptsInlineDatumsSupportedInEra era where
    ReferenceTxInsScriptsInlineDatumsInBabbageEra :: ReferenceTxInsScriptsInlineDatumsSupportedInEra BabbageEra

You immediately know you which era you were trying to convert from as this is given via the ReferenceTxInsScriptsInlineDatumsInBabbageEra constructor.

If you want more precise control over how we render the type (instead of using Show), implementing a typeclass to do that would be fine. Although I think show is good enough for now.

cardano-api/src/Cardano/Api/Address.hs

cardano-api/src/Cardano/Api/Query.hs

cardano-api/src/Cardano/Api/Script.hs

cardano-api/src/Cardano/Api/TxBody.hs

cardano-cli/src/Cardano/CLI/Shelley/Run/Transaction.hs

newhoggy · 2022-07-14T01:39:01Z

EraCastError now stores the value instead of the type name.

comments addressed

Jimbo4350

Minor fixes

Jimbo4350 · 2022-07-21T18:59:46Z

cardano-cli/src/Cardano/CLI/Shelley/Run/Transaction.hs

@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ import qualified Cardano.Binary as CBOR
 import           Cardano.Ledger.Shelley.Scripts ()
 import           Cardano.Ledger.ShelleyMA.TxBody ()

+import           Cardano.Api.EraCast


This should not be exposed to cardano-cli. Whatever you need should be exposed via Cardano.Api or Cardano.Api.Shelley.

Jimbo4350 · 2022-07-21T18:59:57Z

cardano-cli/src/Cardano/CLI/Shelley/Run/Transaction.hs


+import qualified Cardano.Api as Api


These modules are in the wrong place

addressed comments

Jimbo4350

Great work @newhoggy

newhoggy · 2022-07-22T15:16:27Z

bors r+

4135: Transaction build in any era r=newhoggy a=newhoggy Resolves #3909 Co-authored-by: John Ky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jordan Millar <[email protected]>

Jimbo4350 · 2022-07-22T15:24:42Z

bors r-

iohk-bors · 2022-07-22T15:24:44Z

Canceled.

Jimbo4350

https://input-output-rnd.slack.com/archives/CR599HMFX/p1658502469192999?thread_ts=1658497876.427649&cid=CR599HMFX

…than the current era. This is achieved by adding a new EraCast type class which allows some types such as the UTxO type to change era.

confirmed to work for buliding alonzo transactions

Jimbo4350

LGTM! Can you squash the last 4 commits before merging?

* Swap order of arguments to eraCast * Improve error type for the eraCast operation * Store the value instead of the type name in EraCastError * Tidy up imports

newhoggy · 2022-07-26T22:54:54Z

Squashed.

newhoggy · 2022-07-26T22:54:59Z

bors r+

iohk-bors · 2022-07-26T23:38:58Z

Build succeeded:

after IntersectMBO/cardano-node#4135 is fixed.

newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch from 3590002 to 2486484 Compare July 5, 2022 13:02

newhoggy marked this pull request as ready for review July 5, 2022 13:02

newhoggy requested review from dcoutts, Jimbo4350, erikd and JaredCorduan as code owners July 5, 2022 13:02

newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch 3 times, most recently from 11da8e5 to df23de5 Compare July 5, 2022 13:18

Jimbo4350 previously requested changes Jul 8, 2022

View reviewed changes

cardano-cli/src/Cardano/CLI/Shelley/Run/Transaction.hs Show resolved Hide resolved

newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch from df23de5 to 01c061e Compare July 9, 2022 01:43

newhoggy requested a review from Jimbo4350 July 9, 2022 09:24

newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch from 4db7ef3 to 24866ae Compare July 10, 2022 03:50

Jimbo4350 previously requested changes Jul 13, 2022

View reviewed changes

newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch from ac0a82c to 2a7befe Compare July 14, 2022 01:37

newhoggy requested a review from Jimbo4350 July 14, 2022 01:39

newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch from 2a7befe to 5a84f94 Compare July 14, 2022 03:16

rdlrt mentioned this pull request Jul 17, 2022

Add notes about the transaction era need to match cardano-foundation/developer-portal#701

Closed

Jimbo4350 previously requested changes Jul 21, 2022

View reviewed changes

newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch from 5a84f94 to d463e01 Compare July 21, 2022 23:46

newhoggy requested a review from Jimbo4350 July 22, 2022 00:15

Jimbo4350 approved these changes Jul 22, 2022

View reviewed changes

saratomaz mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2022

check that calculate-plutus-script-cost include script hash for reference scripts IntersectMBO/cardano-node-tests#1276

Merged

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2022

Merge #4135

443fb1f

4135: Transaction build in any era r=newhoggy a=newhoggy Resolves #3909 Co-authored-by: John Ky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jordan Millar <[email protected]>

Jimbo4350 self-requested a review July 22, 2022 15:24

Jimbo4350 previously requested changes Jul 22, 2022

View reviewed changes

newhoggy and others added 2 commits July 25, 2022 20:05

Allow transaction build command to build a transaction for era other …

503f0ae

…than the current era. This is achieved by adding a new EraCast type class which allows some types such as the UTxO type to change era.

Remove Summon type class and modify EraCast type class

80bd530

newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch from d463e01 to 71072a6 Compare July 25, 2022 13:59

newhoggy changed the title ~~Transaction build in any era~~ Transaction build in any alonzo era when on babbage testnet Jul 26, 2022

newhoggy requested a review from Jimbo4350 July 26, 2022 09:32

newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch from 71072a6 to cd0d56b Compare July 26, 2022 11:12

Jimbo4350 approved these changes Jul 26, 2022

View reviewed changes

Tidy up

af2e359

* Swap order of arguments to eraCast * Improve error type for the eraCast operation * Store the value instead of the type name in EraCastError * Tidy up imports

newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch from cd0d56b to af2e359 Compare July 26, 2022 22:53

iohk-bors bot merged commit 675c614 into master Jul 26, 2022

iohk-bors bot deleted the newhoggy/transaction-in-any-era branch July 26, 2022 23:39

CarlosLopezDeLara mentioned this pull request Aug 2, 2022

1.35.3 SCOPE #4257

Closed

12 tasks

This was referenced Aug 8, 2022

[BUG] - cannot use transaction build command to build Shelley/Allegra era Tx in Babbage #4286

Closed

[BUG] - cannot use transaction build command to build Mary era Tx in Babbage #4287

Open

mkoura added a commit to mkoura/cardano-node-tests that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2022

New build command skipif

1bc51cf

after IntersectMBO/cardano-node#4135 is fixed.

mkoura mentioned this pull request Aug 8, 2022

New build command skipif IntersectMBO/cardano-node-tests#1311

Merged

mkoura added a commit to IntersectMBO/cardano-node-tests that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2022

New build command skipif

ccfb8d6

after IntersectMBO/cardano-node#4135 is fixed.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Transaction build in any alonzo era when on babbage testnet #4135

Transaction build in any alonzo era when on babbage testnet #4135

newhoggy commented Jul 5, 2022 •

edited

Loading

newhoggy commented Jul 5, 2022

Jimbo4350 left a comment •

edited

Loading

Jimbo4350 left a comment •

edited

Loading

newhoggy commented Jul 14, 2022

Jimbo4350 left a comment

Jimbo4350 Jul 21, 2022

Jimbo4350 Jul 21, 2022

Jimbo4350 left a comment

newhoggy commented Jul 22, 2022

Jimbo4350 commented Jul 22, 2022

iohk-bors bot commented Jul 22, 2022

Jimbo4350 left a comment •

edited

Loading

Jimbo4350 left a comment

newhoggy commented Jul 26, 2022

newhoggy commented Jul 26, 2022

iohk-bors bot commented Jul 26, 2022

Transaction build in any alonzo era when on babbage testnet #4135

Transaction build in any alonzo era when on babbage testnet #4135

Conversation

newhoggy commented Jul 5, 2022 • edited Loading

newhoggy commented Jul 5, 2022

Jimbo4350 left a comment • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Jimbo4350 left a comment • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

newhoggy commented Jul 14, 2022

Jimbo4350 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Jimbo4350 Jul 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Jimbo4350 Jul 21, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Jimbo4350 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

newhoggy commented Jul 22, 2022

Jimbo4350 commented Jul 22, 2022

iohk-bors bot commented Jul 22, 2022

Jimbo4350 left a comment • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Jimbo4350 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

newhoggy commented Jul 26, 2022

newhoggy commented Jul 26, 2022

iohk-bors bot commented Jul 26, 2022

newhoggy commented Jul 5, 2022 •

edited

Loading

Jimbo4350 left a comment •

edited

Loading

Jimbo4350 left a comment •

edited

Loading

Jimbo4350 left a comment •

edited

Loading