We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reported by Jeff Haas on tools-discuss
Consider the following: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=rfc8955 https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=rfc5575 RFC 8955 is a -bis of RFC 5575. The 8955 IPR page says "5575 doesn't have IPR disclosures". However, you can see that 5575 absolutely has some.
Consider the following:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=rfc8955 https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=rfc5575
RFC 8955 is a -bis of RFC 5575.
The 8955 IPR page says "5575 doesn't have IPR disclosures". However, you can see that 5575 absolutely has some.
The IPR search result page should include the rfc.came_from_draft internet draft for any rfc result rows returned as related documents.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the case of rfc8955, the search results should show disclosures against:
rfc8955 rfc7674 (because 8955 obsoletes 7674) rfc5575 (because 8955 obsoletes 5575) draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis (because this draft became rfc8955) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis (because this draft ecame rfc7674) draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec (because this draft became rfc5575)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Reported by Jeff Haas on tools-discuss
The IPR search result page should include the rfc.came_from_draft internet draft for any rfc result rows returned as related documents.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: