Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Purpose" table incorrect #5720

Closed
1 task done
larseggert opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5728
Closed
1 task done

"Purpose" table incorrect #5720

larseggert opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5728
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@larseggert
Copy link
Collaborator

Describe the issue

The "purpose" table on the top of https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/requests seems to be incorrect. It currently lists 90 "regular" timeslot requests only, but when you look at the GEN-area requests, you see the hackathon requests with a purpose of "Coding" - shouldn't those be reported in that table?

Code of Conduct

@larseggert larseggert added the bug Something isn't working label May 31, 2023
@rjsparks
Copy link
Member

Groups of type "team" are currently filtered out of the table - eodir, hackathon, and tools sessions don't show in the summary.

We could change the label of the summary, add a note about teams being filtered out of the summary, add a second summary table for groups that are not teams, or make some other adjustment.

The original request for the table came from Liz to help understand the pressure for the agenda building process. What use case do you have in mind where having the team sessions in the summary would be useful?

@rjsparks
Copy link
Member

btw:

request_summary_exclude_group_types = ['team']

def request_summary_filter(session):
if (session.group.area is None
or session.group.type.slug in request_summary_exclude_group_types
or session.current_status == 'notmeet'):
return False
return True

summary_sessions = list(filter(request_summary_filter, sessions))

@larseggert
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't have a use case, I just noted what I saw as a discrepancy. Some explanatory text would be sufficient.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 9, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants