Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify behavior of add_enclave transaction #270

Open
masomel opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Clarify behavior of add_enclave transaction #270

masomel opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Primary component is missing or incorrect documentation

Comments

@masomel
Copy link

masomel commented Apr 24, 2020

Following the #259 (comment) thread, we should discuss the behavior of the add_enclave transaction in Sawtooth and CCF.

The main outstanding question from this thread is whether adding a duplicate enclave should be treated as an error or as a no-op. As part of addressing this issue, we should also add more corner cases of add_enclave to our eservice tests.
@marcelamelara marcelamelara added the documentation Primary component is missing or incorrect documentation label Feb 3, 2023
@prakashngit
Copy link
Contributor

@marcelamelara Could you please clarify what is a "duplicate enclave" ? (and a little bit more about the issue that you see), thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Primary component is missing or incorrect documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@masomel @prakashngit @marcelamelara