cutin options #1495
Merged
cutin options #1495
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
saulfield
approved these changes
Jul 11, 2022
saulfield
approved these changes
Jul 12, 2022
qianyi-sun
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds the
slow_down_afterandhold_periodoptions to the SMARTS lane changing model.This is so we can simulate situations where the agent vehicle being cutin-upon definitely must react.
Edit: upon further discussion with Patrick, I've also now added the
multi_lane_cutinoption. And this led me to discover a bug in the handing of boolean parameters (cf. the previousdogmaticoption) that I've now fixed as well.