-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lower accuracy of PSPNet than the reported numbers of this repos #61
Comments
hi,i got the same problem,have you solved it |
No, I haven't. Still do not where the problem is. |
the author use resnet101 and ms predict ,,do you use the same batchsize and cropsize? |
Yes, I use the default configuration. Batchsize and cropsize should be the same as the author's implementation. Are your results same to my numbers? |
my results is lower than yours,because i don't have enough gpu, i also know that many other people can 't reach author's result ,yours seems to be the best one so far, i think your results seems that you don't use ms predict, |
Yes, I didn't use MS prediction, because the author's results 0.7907/0.8636/0.9534, also do not use MS prediction. They are indicated by |
maybe you can try this repo: https://github.com/SegmentationBLWX/sssegmentation |
Trained with PASCAL VOC2012 segmentation dataset, I got 0.7843/0.8593/0.9520(ss)、0.7938/0.8657/0.9540(ms)with TITAN Xp(4 GPUs). |
I got Eval result: mIoU/mAcc/allAcc 0.6570/0.7378/0.9222 (ss) for PASCAL VOC2021 on 8 nvidia rtx 2080 gpus |
Hi, I trained PSPNet with ResNet101 as the backbone. The mIoU values are 78.29/85.74/95.18 which are lower than the numbers in the readme file (0.7907/0.8636/0.9534). I use the same config as the author provided and do not change anything. Does somebody get the same accuracy as the reported? My PyTorch version is 1.3.1. Don't know if PyTorch will affect the accuracy a little.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: