You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is it possible to add a warning to the old Haddock docs that those are outdated, and to add a link the latest docs? Or do an immediate redirect? It tripped me up (and others i know as well) in thinking this was the latest Markup syntax, because its links appear at the top of search results (at least on my machine):
As an alternative, we could try to demote its page rank somehow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree that outdated documentation makes navigating the Haskell world treacherous. According to the work-in-progress PR to classify the subsites of haskell.org the Haddock subsite is owned by the Haddock maintainers. We should file an issue on the Haddock Github page to ask what they want to do (though please keep this issue open until we have a resolution). If you'd like to file it @malteneuss then please do, otherwise I'll do when I get round to it. I suspect the Haddock maintainers will want to
update that documentation to the latest version, or
insert a redirect to the latest version hosted elsewhere (if it is -- does anyone know)
Is it possible to add a warning to the old Haddock docs that those are outdated, and to add a link the latest docs? Or do an immediate redirect? It tripped me up (and others i know as well) in thinking this was the latest Markup syntax, because its links appear at the top of search results (at least on my machine):
![haskell_haddock_search_results](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5301202/145479514-e48cdf1e-4c29-4090-8d09-b81318d1e724.png)
As an alternative, we could try to demote its page rank somehow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: