Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(TF-18960) Enable store references in deployment configuration #390

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

ansgarm
Copy link
Member

@ansgarm ansgarm commented Aug 16, 2024

store_references

@ansgarm ansgarm requested a review from a team as a code owner August 16, 2024 11:40
@ansgarm ansgarm changed the title stacks store references Enable store references in deployment configuration Aug 16, 2024
@ansgarm ansgarm changed the title Enable store references in deployment configuration (TF-18960) Enable store references in deployment configuration Aug 16, 2024
internal/schema/stacks/1.9/store_block.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ansgarm ansgarm merged commit 27f3526 into pre-release Aug 19, 2024
5 checks passed
@ansgarm ansgarm deleted the stacks-store-references branch August 19, 2024 08:49
jpogran pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2024
* feat: early decode store blocks in deployment files

* feat: create targets for store blocks to allow references to dynamic values within

* refactor: use a specific example for the varset id
ansgarm added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
* feat: early decode store blocks in deployment files

* feat: create targets for store blocks to allow references to dynamic values within

* refactor: use a specific example for the varset id
ansgarm added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
* feat: early decode store blocks in deployment files

* feat: create targets for store blocks to allow references to dynamic values within

* refactor: use a specific example for the varset id
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants