-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
design / use of policy_definition_reference in azurerm_policy_set_definition #8030
Comments
Hi @tbugfinder thanks for this issue! It should be possible to use
In this module, I defined some primitive variables like To use this simple module, I tried this
And then run a
Hope this helps, thanks |
Hi @ArcturusZhang |
Hi @ArcturusZhang , |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
Hello,
I'm wondering about the design of implementation #7018 and marking previous options as deprecated.
Looking at deprecating
policy_definitions
in favor ofpolicy_definition_reference
it is getting impossible to write a generic terraform module to support use ofdynamic policy_definition_reference
as keys are too broad to be pre-defined.Could anybody share how they use
dynamic policy_definition_reference
within a generic policy terraform module?Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: