azurerm_sql_managed_instance: Support for dns_zone_partner_id

[aristosvo]

Fixes #13932 (½)

This PR is the first step of 2 towards the failover capability as described in #13932. This first step makes it possible to share the DNS zone, to make failover possible. Documentation about failover for MI can be found here.

Acceptance Tests

TF_ACC=1 go test -v ./internal/services/sql -run=TestAccAzureRMSqlMiServer_dnsZonePartner -timeout 1800m -ldflags="-X=github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/version.ProviderVersion=acc"
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMSqlMiServer_dnsZonePartner
=== PAUSE TestAccAzureRMSqlMiServer_dnsZonePartner
=== CONT  TestAccAzureRMSqlMiServer_dnsZonePartner
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMSqlMiServer_dnsZonePartner (31669.68s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/sql	31671.235s

ToDo

• Docs
• Run the Acceptance Test (takes a long time.., this issue verifies if we could possibly speed it up a bit)

[katbyte]

I think we're missing docs?

[aristosvo]

Acceptance Tests are passing:

TF_ACC=1 go test -v ./internal/services/sql -run=TestAccAzureRMSqlMiServer_dnsZonePartner -timeout 1800m -ldflags="-X=github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/version.ProviderVersion=acc"
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMSqlMiServer_dnsZonePartner
=== PAUSE TestAccAzureRMSqlMiServer_dnsZonePartner
=== CONT  TestAccAzureRMSqlMiServer_dnsZonePartner
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMSqlMiServer_dnsZonePartner (31669.68s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/sql	31671.235s

[katbyte]

Thanks @aristosvo - LGTM 👍

[github-actions]

This functionality has been released in v2.84.0 of the Terraform Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.