Cloudwatch rum: add application id to exported attributes

[NabilHouidi]

Description

Adds an application_id computed attribute to the AWS CloudWatch RUM resource.

Using the application ID as the resource's id requires more modifications to the code, updating the tests, and might introduce breaking changes. I'll be happy to implement those changes if that is what's needed to fix the issue.

However, this fix is enough to make the resource useful in my case: dynamically generated RUM javascript template.

Relations

Relates #26430

References

https://github.com/aws-observability/aws-rum-web/blob/main/docs/cdn_installation.md#arguments

Output from Acceptance Testing

$ make testacc PKG=rum
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/rum/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20   -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccRUMAppMonitor_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccRUMAppMonitor_basic
=== RUN   TestAccRUMAppMonitor_tags
=== PAUSE TestAccRUMAppMonitor_tags
=== RUN   TestAccRUMAppMonitor_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccRUMAppMonitor_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccRUMAppMonitor_basic
=== CONT  TestAccRUMAppMonitor_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccRUMAppMonitor_tags
--- PASS: TestAccRUMAppMonitor_disappears (26.66s)
--- PASS: TestAccRUMAppMonitor_basic (49.98s)
--- PASS: TestAccRUMAppMonitor_tags (65.53s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/rum	67.638s
...

[github-actions]

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
• Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

• Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
• For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
• Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

[github-actions]

Welcome @NabilHouidi 👋

It looks like this is your first Pull Request submission to the Terraform AWS Provider! If you haven’t already done so please make sure you have checked out our CONTRIBUTOR guide and FAQ to make sure your contribution is adhering to best practice and has all the necessary elements in place for a successful approval.

Also take a look at our FAQ which details how we prioritize Pull Requests for inclusion.

Thanks again, and welcome to the community! 😃

[NabilHouidi]

@ewbankkit As I am a new contributor here, I am feeling a bit confused. should I do something to move this forward?

[ewbankkit]

LGTM 🚀.

% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccRUMAppMonitor_' PKG=rum ACCTEST_PARALLELISM=3
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/rum/... -v -count 1 -parallel 3  -run=TestAccRUMAppMonitor_ -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccRUMAppMonitor_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccRUMAppMonitor_basic
=== RUN   TestAccRUMAppMonitor_tags
=== PAUSE TestAccRUMAppMonitor_tags
=== RUN   TestAccRUMAppMonitor_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccRUMAppMonitor_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccRUMAppMonitor_basic
=== CONT  TestAccRUMAppMonitor_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccRUMAppMonitor_tags
--- PASS: TestAccRUMAppMonitor_disappears (22.01s)
--- PASS: TestAccRUMAppMonitor_basic (44.38s)
--- PASS: TestAccRUMAppMonitor_tags (56.74s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/rum	61.394s

[ewbankkit]

@NabilHouidi Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏.

I renamed the new attribute to app_monitor_id to better match the underlying AWS API.

[github-actions]

This functionality has been released in v4.36.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.