-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: nodejs16.x support for aws_lambda_function #24714
Comments
We will need to wait for the AWS SDK for Go release that adds the enumeration value. |
@ewbankkit this has been released in v1.44.13 (2022-05-12) |
Hi 👋 . Will Node.js 16 support only be available in v4 of the provider? Or is there a chance of compatibility coming to v3 as well? |
I don't think it's coming to v3 :(. But hopefully an easier migration path to v4 becomes available. #23106 |
I'd like to encourage the team to make this available for v3. |
Same. As additional context, Node.js 16 support is especially important now that more engineers are starting to work on new laptops with Apple silicon. Previous Node versions aren't compatible with the local environments on those dev machines. If possible, it would be a huge help if we could get support for it in v3 of the provider so that our local environments could start to match our deployed ones more quickly while we continue to work toward a v4 upgrade. |
@wilcoxmd @willfarrell @RobvH This was just released for in https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/releases/tag/v3.75.2 |
Amazing! Thanks to all for helping make this happen! |
FYI: |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. |
Community Note
Description
The Nodejs v16 runtime has been released for Lambda. Official announcement coming soon.
Currently returns:
I expect it to be resolved when the go SDK is updated, and no change needed.
New or Affected Resource(s)
References
Requires AWS SDK for GO v1.44.13: #24768.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: