Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BugFix: Add bypass_file_system_lockout_safety_check to efs efs_file_system_policy #20838

Conversation

tommrr
Copy link
Contributor

@tommrr tommrr commented Sep 8, 2021

Allow the ability to bypass the EFS file system lockout protection.

The fix is to allow pass through from of the 'BypassPolicyLockoutSafetyCheck' to the underlying GoSDK.

This is the error that the fix is for, where unable to create or update an filesystem policy.

Error: error creating EFS File System Policy "": InvalidPolicyException: This policy would prevent future FileSystemPolicy updates. Retry the request with the BypassPolicyLockoutSafetyCheck parameter to apply this policy.

Tested against our test environment.

Community Note

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

@github-actions github-actions bot added documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. service/efs Issues and PRs that pertain to the efs service. size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Sep 8, 2021
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Welcome @tomrosier 👋

It looks like this is your first Pull Request submission to the Terraform AWS Provider! If you haven’t already done so please make sure you have checked out our CONTRIBUTING guide and FAQ to make sure your contribution is adhering to best practice and has all the necessary elements in place for a successful approval.

Also take a look at our FAQ which details how we prioritize Pull Requests for inclusion.

Thanks again, and welcome to the community! 😃

@breathingdust breathingdust added enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Sep 8, 2021
@ewbankkit ewbankkit self-assigned this Sep 10, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. size/L Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. and removed size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Sep 10, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@ewbankkit ewbankkit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀.

Commercial
% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_'                      
TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_ -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_PolicyBypass
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_PolicyBypass
=== CONT  TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_PolicyBypass
=== CONT  TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_disappears (23.81s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_basic (36.74s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_PolicyBypass (37.40s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	41.244s
GovCloud
% make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_ -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_PolicyBypass
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_PolicyBypass
=== CONT  TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_PolicyBypass
=== CONT  TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_disappears (27.16s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_basic (44.23s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEFSFileSystemPolicy_PolicyBypass (44.28s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	47.484s

@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor

@tomrosier Thanks for the contribution 🎉 👏.
I changed the new argument name from bypass_file_system_lockout_safety_check to bypass_policy_lockout_safety_check to mirror the underlying AWS API.

@ewbankkit ewbankkit merged commit 7d17394 into hashicorp:main Sep 10, 2021
@tommrr tommrr deleted the b-add-efs-bypass-file-system-lockout-safety-check branch September 13, 2021 10:24
@breathingdust breathingdust added this to the v3.59.0 milestone Sep 16, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v3.59.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 21, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/efs Issues and PRs that pertain to the efs service. size/L Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants