rd/iam_policy - tagging support

[DrFaust92]

Community Note

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Relates #17594

Output from acceptance testing:

$ make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_'
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_disappears (27.88s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_description (40.09s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_path (40.27s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_namePrefix (40.36s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_basic (40.69s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_policy (68.83s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_tags (91.92s)


--- PASS: TestAccAWSDataSourceIAMPolicy_basic (36.37s)

[ewbankkit]

Verified acceptance tests:

$ make testacc TEST=./aws/ TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_\|TestAccAWSDataSourceIAMPolicy_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_\|TestAccAWSDataSourceIAMPolicy_ -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSDataSourceIAMPolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSDataSourceIAMPolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_description
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_description
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_tags
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_tags
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_namePrefix
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_namePrefix
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_path
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_path
=== RUN   TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_policy
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_policy
=== CONT  TestAccAWSDataSourceIAMPolicy_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_namePrefix
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_policy
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_path
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_tags
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_description
=== CONT  TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_disappears (23.59s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSDataSourceIAMPolicy_basic (26.33s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_basic (29.82s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_namePrefix (29.98s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_description (29.98s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_path (30.00s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_policy (38.79s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_tags (46.39s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws	46.523s

[bflad]

Looks good, thank you, @DrFaust92 🚀

Output from acceptance testing in AWS Commercial:

--- PASS: TestAccAWSDataSourceIAMPolicy_basic (20.45s)

--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_basic (22.11s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_description (21.92s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_disappears (18.51s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_namePrefix (22.36s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_path (22.27s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_policy (29.66s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_tags (36.52s)

Output from acceptance testing in AWS GovCloud (US):

--- PASS: TestAccAWSDataSourceIAMPolicy_basic (25.35s)

--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_basic (27.37s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_description (27.37s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_disappears (21.46s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_namePrefix (27.86s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_path (27.19s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_policy (41.21s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSIAMPolicy_tags (53.53s)

[ghost]

This has been released in version 3.35.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks!

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!