Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display provider versions in completion/hover detail #303

Closed
radeksimko opened this issue Nov 17, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #329
Closed

Display provider versions in completion/hover detail #303

radeksimko opened this issue Nov 17, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #329
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@radeksimko
Copy link
Member

Current Version

0.9.0

Use-cases

Users benefit from having less accurate schema if the other option is not having any, but as we expose schemas which may not be accurate - e.g. via #302 - we should also find some ways of communicating this to the user.

Proposal

Obtain provider versions via the existing terraform-exec integration (i.e. terraform version output) and put these next to its namespace in the Detail field of the schema, which would then be reflected in the UI.

Examples from Sublime Text:

Screenshot 2020-11-17 at 09 57 17
Screenshot 2020-11-17 at 09 57 03

Examples from VS Code:

Screenshot 2020-11-17 at 10 02 45
Screenshot 2020-11-17 at 10 00 42

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 3, 2021

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the context necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant