You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, the model achieves accuracy lower than the one reported in the paper (37.0, as reported in Tab. 3):
For MoCo baseline (checkpoint shared by you) I got test acc=0.2575
and for MoCo_augself (checkpoint shared by you) I got test acc=0.3224
For MoCo pretrained by myself, I got test acc=0.3309
Thus, I think the issue may be in linear evaluation.
Oddly enough, I roughly reproduced your results on the CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 dataset (with ~0.5% difference), so maybe the issue is with CUB only.
Could you kindly provide some guidance on whether I got the hyperparameters right? Alternatively, how did you set up the CUB files - did you use the default train / test / split?
Best regards!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! Thank you for a great paper and for sharing the code!
I'm looking to reproduce your results on the MoCo model, especially for transferring it to the CUB dataset.
The command I'm running is:
However, the model achieves accuracy lower than the one reported in the paper (37.0, as reported in Tab. 3):
For MoCo baseline (checkpoint shared by you) I got
test acc=0.2575
and for MoCo_augself (checkpoint shared by you) I got
test acc=0.3224
For MoCo pretrained by myself, I got
test acc=0.3309
Thus, I think the issue may be in linear evaluation.
Oddly enough, I roughly reproduced your results on the CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 dataset (with ~0.5% difference), so maybe the issue is with CUB only.
Could you kindly provide some guidance on whether I got the hyperparameters right? Alternatively, how did you set up the CUB files - did you use the default train / test / split?
Best regards!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: