The matcher contains() is misleading

[gmananton]

I found for myself that the matcher name "contains" is a bit misleading. Because it sounds similarly to contains() method of java.util.Collection it may expected to behave like this:
assertThat(List.of(1,2), contains(1))
But the expression above will throw an AssertionError, because contains() is acting like containsExactly().
So how do you think about renaming it?
Unfortunately the obvious problem here - is of course broken back compatibility ( If someone is using this matcher in his tests - they may have been broken and must be refactored

[PakhomovAlexander]

Hi, after spending quite some time on debugging, I realized that the observed behavior stemmed from this function. That is really confusing.

[Pochatkin]

Oh guys, I feel your pain