We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As far as I know, the UML class diagram syntax is "name: type" in all contexts (attributes, parameters, function and return type).
The generated "PlantUML Source" does not follow this rule. It uses Java syntax ("type name").
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'll incorporate this into the next release, but due to other refactoring I'll not use the PR.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
As far as I know, the UML class diagram syntax is "name: type" in all contexts (attributes, parameters, function and return type).
The generated "PlantUML Source" does not follow this rule. It uses Java syntax ("type name").
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: