You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Your test program uses x .+= y, so you should know that in Julia 0.5 this has changed meaning to be equivalent to broadcast!(identity, x, x .+ y), so that it mutates the x array (see JuliaLang/julia#17510 … in Julia 0.6 the whole operation will occur in-place without temporaries). So .+ should only be used if the left-hand side is a mutable array, and you don't mind mutating it.
At first glance, this looks like a problem for you, because the left-hand-side in x_exp[rx] .+= y0[ry] is just a number, not mutable? If that is the case, you can just change it to +=.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Your test program uses
x .+= y
, so you should know that in Julia 0.5 this has changed meaning to be equivalent tobroadcast!(identity, x, x .+ y)
, so that it mutates thex
array (see JuliaLang/julia#17510 … in Julia 0.6 the whole operation will occur in-place without temporaries). So.+
should only be used if the left-hand side is a mutable array, and you don't mind mutating it.At first glance, this looks like a problem for you, because the left-hand-side in
x_exp[rx] .+= y0[ry]
is just a number, not mutable? If that is the case, you can just change it to+=
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: