Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature] Add in missing collectors to guaccollect #1721

Closed
pxp928 opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1759
Closed

[feature] Add in missing collectors to guaccollect #1721

pxp928 opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1759
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pxp928
Copy link
Collaborator

pxp928 commented Feb 21, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Add in the missing collectors to guaccollect. Currently, GCS, S3, and git are missing. This would allow them to be used via guacingest with pubsub and blob store.

The implementation for these will be very similar to guaccollect files.

GCS and S3 are implemented in guacone so that can be used as a reference.

NOTE:

The documentation (https://docs.guac.sh/) needs to be updated on how to properly set up and utilize guaccollect

@pxp928 pxp928 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 21, 2024
@pxp928
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pxp928 commented Feb 21, 2024

cc @kanchan-dhamane

@nathannaveen
Copy link
Contributor

Could I work on this?

@pxp928
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pxp928 commented Mar 8, 2024

The documentation (https://docs.guac.sh/) needs to be updated on how to properly set up and utilize guaccollect

@pxp928
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pxp928 commented Mar 8, 2024

Closing this issue as the work is done. Adding documentation issue guacsec/guac-docs#120

@pxp928 pxp928 closed this as completed Mar 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants