mandatory pedestrian ways disappeared

[a-pirard]

OSM.org is showing the possible ways that vehicle and pedestrian can follow, doesn't it?
Well, pedestrian crossings are ways that the pedestrians are compelled to follow but they disappeared from the map.

[polarbearing]

Please describe clearly what has disappeared, what was there before, and when.

This map style renders a subset of features that are in the OSM database, not possibilities.

If you want to discuss that pedestrian crossings should be rendered, that is already discussed in #1943

[drkludge]

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:06 PM, polarbearing [email protected]
wrote:

Please describe clearly what has disappeared, what was there before, and
when.

This map style renders a subset of features that are in the OSM database,
not possibilities.

If you want to discuss that pedestrian crossings should be rendered, that
is already discussed in #1943
#1943

Here is a highway=pedestrian area. I don't know if area area or way makes
a difference.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115940362#map=19/33.44890/-112.07409 . In
addition, there are a bunch of crossing.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115940362#map=18/33.44910/-112.07295&layers=C
Note however, that I had to switch the Cycle Map to see the crossings
reander.
AS of 3/8/2016 at 21:18, both of these features still render.

Regards,
Greg

[matkoniecz]

Note however, that I had to switch the Cycle Map to see the crossings reander.

"Pedestrian crossings not visible" is discussed in #1943

[a-pirard]

Please reopen this issue.
It has little to do with #1943 which goes a long way discussing styles.
It is about crossings like
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1312239864
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1533108508
and many others, all I reckon, that have been removed from the map in a recent rendering update.
As I say, they are important for the map to show a GPS route for example, especially that one that children must use to go to their school.
This issue has been discussed on [email protected].

[matkoniecz]

Rendering of highway=crossing is covered by #1318 and #1943.

highway=crossing tag was never rendered in this style

[a-pirard]

On 2016-04-01 17:47, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:

Rendering of highway=crossing is covered by #1318
#1318 and
#1943 #1943.

highway=crossing tag was never rendered in this style

OK, I'll stop mapping crossings until they are useful and they and I can
see which one is missing.
It's a pity to have drawn these ways and steps
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4046783672 and to be unable to
continue the access to the building with just a simple line meaning a
crossing.

[matkoniecz]

OK, I'll stop mapping crossings until they are useful and they and I can see which one is missing.

Note that highway=crossing is rerndered in some styles like http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=19&lat=48.86486&lon=2.40945&layers=B0000000FFFFFF

[a-pirard]

On 2016-04-01 19:13, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:

Note that highway=crossing is rerndered in some styles like
http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=19&lat=48.86486&lon=2.40945&layers=B0000000FFFFFF

Nice, but I have problems getting people interested in a single OSM.org
already.
What if I would have to show them a catalog of other maps depending on
what they want to see such as ubiquitous and useful features as
pedestrian crossings, ride sharing stop posts like bus stops, amusements
in a park, etc...
That is not asking for extravagance, is it.