Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2021-03-04] Implementors: make sure change to Default Value Coercion Rules is compatible #645

Closed
benjie opened this issue Mar 7, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
Action item 🎬 Everyone 🌐 Need everyone to look at this

Comments

@benjie
Copy link
Member

benjie commented Mar 7, 2021

RFC was moved from proposal to Draft

ACTION - We need to make sure that when applied to existing impls that this works


Note: Action Item issues are reviewed and closed during Working Group
meetings.

@benjie benjie self-assigned this Mar 7, 2021
@benjie benjie added the Everyone 🌐 Need everyone to look at this label Mar 7, 2021
@benjie
Copy link
Member Author

benjie commented Apr 8, 2021

@leebyron It would be really helpful to have an @graphql/implementors or similar group that we can ping the relevant people behind the various GraphQL implementations (after they opt-in, of course).

@eapache
Copy link
Member

eapache commented Apr 8, 2021

cc @rmosolgo

@leebyron
Copy link
Collaborator

leebyron commented Jun 2, 2021

Created https://github.com/orgs/graphql/teams/implementers/

@leebyron
Copy link
Collaborator

leebyron commented Jul 1, 2021

@graphql/implementers - I'd love your feedback on this

See related change here: graphql/graphql-js#3049

@spawnia
Copy link
Member

spawnia commented Jul 5, 2021

I hit this issue in graphql-php and am happy to see it moving forward. The proposed solution makes sense to me.

@leebyron leebyron closed this as completed Sep 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Action item 🎬 Everyone 🌐 Need everyone to look at this
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants