Skip to content

Conversation

@56quarters
Copy link
Contributor

This is required because Mimir sets a default resolver based on if
tenant federation is enabled. However, GEM has already updated to the
dskit resolver and so doesn't use the correct or same resolver that
Mimir is.

Signed-off-by: Nick Pillitteri [email protected]

Checklist

  • Tests updated
  • Documentation added
  • CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 31, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@pstibrany
Copy link
Contributor

Please note that there is already #1587 in progress that updates dskit. There is still one problem to fix (with advanced flags).

@56quarters 56quarters force-pushed the 56quarters/dskit-tenant branch from 5ee42d7 to eedb38b Compare March 31, 2022 18:33
@pstibrany
Copy link
Contributor

If you merge this, I can also rebase my PR and fix remaining problems there.

@56quarters
Copy link
Contributor Author

56quarters commented Mar 31, 2022

Please note that there is already #1587 in progress that updates dskit. There is still one problem to fix (with advanced flags).

It looks like the changes to flagext.Secret will conflict / overlap between these PRs. I'll rebase after #1587 is merged. Thanks!

Will merge this as-is and let @pstibrany fix remaining problems.

This is required because Mimir sets a default resolver based on if
tenant federation is enabled. However, GEM has already updated to the
dskit resolver and so doesn't use the correct or same resolver that
Mimir is.

Signed-off-by: Nick Pillitteri <[email protected]>
@56quarters 56quarters force-pushed the 56quarters/dskit-tenant branch from eedb38b to f3d4c2d Compare March 31, 2022 19:05
@56quarters 56quarters merged commit 8f8f2c0 into main Mar 31, 2022
@56quarters 56quarters deleted the 56quarters/dskit-tenant branch March 31, 2022 20:32
dimitarvdimitrov added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2022
pracucci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants