From ab62e4172806d4741c80ed1206a5b4ef6d552fb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:48:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Enter a description of the change. discard optimization to
 use cloneNode deep in some cases

R=arv
BUG=

Review URL: https://codereview.appspot.com/20030043
---
 src/TemplateBinding.js | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/TemplateBinding.js b/src/TemplateBinding.js
index 86ad2e2..22cba89 100644
--- a/src/TemplateBinding.js
+++ b/src/TemplateBinding.js
@@ -530,8 +530,7 @@
         content.bindingMap_ = map;
       }
 
-      var instance = map.hasSubTemplate ?
-          deepCloneIgnoreTemplateContent(content) : content.cloneNode(true);
+      var instance = deepCloneIgnoreTemplateContent(content);
 
       addMapBindings(instance, map, model, delegate, bound);
       // TODO(rafaelw): We can do this more lazily, but setting a sentinel
@@ -810,7 +809,6 @@
       node.isTemplate_ = true;
       map = map || [];
       map.templateRef = node;
-      map.hasSubTemplate = true;
     }
 
     var child = node.firstChild, index = 0;
@@ -822,8 +820,6 @@
       map = map || [];
       map.children = map.children || {};
       map.children[index] = childMap;
-      if (childMap.hasSubTemplate)
-        map.hasSubTemplate = true;
     }
 
     return map;