Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: better typing for metadata #2234

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 24, 2023

Conversation

ddelgrosso1
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #1817 🦕

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 requested review from a team as code owners July 12, 2023 21:27
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: xl Pull request size is extra large. api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-storage API. labels Jul 12, 2023
Copy link
Member

@frankyn frankyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Had a question on if this is a breaking change; I think so, and trying to understand how Sameena's concerns were concluded. I'm still reviewing the PR so just an initial comment.

projectNumber?: string;
team?: 'editors' | 'owners' | 'viewers';
};
role?: 'OWNER' | 'READER' | 'WRITER' | 'FULL_CONTROL';
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this strict typing in that if new fields are added in the API the node.js client will need to be updated as well?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://github.com/googleapis/nodejs-storage/pull/2234/files#diff-747d768492a54441f1682714c15429c572d74c031145c71672dec819ff94fbbbR109 this would act as a catch all for anything new so that it flows through without us having to make a change. However, we would obviously want to add anything new to the appropriate metadata interface to continue to support up to date typings.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the unknown too - encourages customers to validate it

Copy link
Member

@danielbankhead danielbankhead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a great change - customers are gonna love it (including myself).

package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
projectNumber?: string;
team?: 'editors' | 'owners' | 'viewers';
};
role?: 'OWNER' | 'READER' | 'WRITER' | 'FULL_CONTROL';
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the unknown too - encourages customers to validate it

Copy link
Member

@frankyn frankyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a few comments; the types looked appropriate from my review and more wondering about the use of unknown

export interface GetFilesCallback {
(
err: Error | null,
files?: File[],
nextQuery?: {},
apiResponse?: Metadata
apiResponse?: unknown
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there more guidance on when to use unknown?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here is some docs.

The reason I had to go with unknown is sort of twofold, first previously Metadata was defined as any and was being used to represent ACTUAL metadata as well as a raw API response. Ideally we would have a well defined type for an API response but seeing as we are still using 2 HTTP libraries that is a bit more difficult currently.

}

export interface GetLabelsOptions {
userProject?: string;
}

export type GetLabelsResponse = [Metadata];
export type GetLabelsResponse = [unknown];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are API responses being labelled unknown?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See my comments above, the short of it is that previously API responses were any and due to the slightly different shapes of responses between Gaxios and teeny-request I chose to go with unknown until we can more clearly type API responses.

acl?: AclMetadata[] | null;
autoclass?: {
enabled?: boolean;
toggleTime?: string;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be Date as well?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nvm!

acl?: AclMetadata[] | null;
autoclass?: {
enabled?: boolean;
toggleTime?: string;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nvm!

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 merged commit ee8354e into googleapis:storage-seven Jul 24, 2023
12 checks passed
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 deleted the metadata-typing branch July 24, 2023 13:53
ddelgrosso1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2023
* test: cleanup kms tests to avoid setting incorrect keys (#2213)

* chore(deps): update dependency c8 to v8 (#2221)

* feat!: better typing for metadata

* more metadata typing

* fix merge problems

* remove extend

* fix merge conflicts

---------

Co-authored-by: Mend Renovate <[email protected]>
ddelgrosso1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2023
* refactor!: Remove `extend` and Treat Provided Options as Mutable (#2204)

* refactor: Remove `extend`

This is the prelimary, `src`-only commit.

* fix: object merging

* chore: remove log

* chore: minor clean-up

* chore: more clean-up

* refactor: remove `extend`

* perf!: treat provided options as mutable

* feat!: stronger typing for lifecycle rules (#2215)

* fix!: Do not return responsebody in delete, only raw response (#2236)

* fix!: Remove extraneous validation in favor of server errors (#2237)

* fix!: Remove extraneous validation in favor of server errors

* remove test

* refactor!: mark bucket.setLabels and associated interfaces as deprecated (#2214)

* refactor!: mark bucket.setLabels and associated interfaces as deprecated

* update addBucketLabel to use setMetadata

* mark getLabels / deleteLabels deprecated, update samples

* feat!: disable source maps for smaller bundle size (#2240)

* feat!: better typing for metadata (#2234)

* test: cleanup kms tests to avoid setting incorrect keys (#2213)

* chore(deps): update dependency c8 to v8 (#2221)

* feat!: better typing for metadata

* more metadata typing

* fix merge problems

* remove extend

* fix merge conflicts

---------

Co-authored-by: Mend Renovate <[email protected]>

* chore!: make node 14 the minimum version (#2230)

* chore!: make node 14 the minimum version

* move conformance test to node 14

* package upgrades, fix unit test compilation

* update google owned deps

* fix tests

* remove node 12 kokoro folders

* merge and fix issues

* 🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor

See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md

* export new metadata types from index

* fix samples tests

* fix system test

---------

Co-authored-by: Daniel Bankhead <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mend Renovate <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-storage API. size: xl Pull request size is extra large.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants