-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Justify the protobuf/testProtobuf dependency feature or remove it #25
Comments
SGTM. Since true dependencies would be passed to |
The reason those are called dependencies (I refer to It seems like the issue is really between what do we pass as files for protoc to compile vs. which files get passed in as Also, see comments in #8 (comment) Thoughts? |
As far as I can tell, this feature has been well used by API services that publish protos as artifacts. We can spare it for now :) |
The Protobuf dependencies, i.e..,
protobuf
,testProtobuf
etc, define packages of proto files that will be compiled along with those under the src dir. This feature is inherited from @aantono's plugin. However, I don't feel it should be called dependency. It's just another form of sources. The scenarios described in #15 and #8 sound more like dependency.Maybe we should move this feature into sourceSets.
@aantono @ejona86 WDYT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: