Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Architecture is incorrectly reported #1787

Closed
punkfairie opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Architecture is incorrectly reported #1787

punkfairie opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@punkfairie
Copy link

  • Task version: v3.38
  • Operating system: macOS 15 beta on arm64
  • Experiments enabled: none

Task incorrectly reports my computer's architecture as x86_64 when I am actually on arm64. This makes Homebrew throw all kinds of errors when trying to install packages with Task.

Task output:

tasks:
  config: brew config

# output - macOS: 15.0-x86_64

Shell output:

brew config
# output - macOS: 15.0-arm64
@task-bot task-bot added the state: needs triage Waiting to be triaged by a maintainer. label Sep 6, 2024
@andreynering andreynering added type: bug Something not working as intended. and removed state: needs triage Waiting to be triaged by a maintainer. labels Sep 6, 2024
@andreynering
Copy link
Member

Hi @punkfairie,

I could not reproduce this on my machine. I get macOS: 14.6.1-arm64 no matter if I call it directly or inside a Taskfile.

Can you tell me which architecture of the task binary you have installed? You can check that by running a task like:

version: '3'

tasks:
  arch: 'echo {{ARCH}}'

@punkfairie
Copy link
Author

Well. Neither can I anymore. No idea what could have possibly changed as I've run no updates and changed nothing about the environment. Disregard I guess!

@pd93 pd93 removed the type: bug Something not working as intended. label Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants