Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Proposal]: ability to generate ports to other branches #9852

Closed
guillep2k opened this issue Jan 17, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed

[Proposal]: ability to generate ports to other branches #9852

guillep2k opened this issue Jan 17, 2020 · 7 comments
Labels
type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.

Comments

@guillep2k
Copy link
Member

It would be cool for a merged PR that there would be a [Generate port] button to create a backport/frontport of the merged commit on another branch.
@guillep2k
Copy link
Member Author

In addition, the PR would have some visual cue that the port is faithful.

This would only work for ports that generate no conflicts, and of course they need to pass the revision process because ports may cause problems even if they merge cleanly.

@techknowlogick techknowlogick added type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. labels Jan 17, 2020
@zeripath
Copy link
Contributor

I'm actually thinking it would be good for us to have a way of importing a patch to or as a branch.

If we have that, then lots of things can hang off that base code.

@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Jan 18, 2020

git apply patchfile

@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Jan 18, 2020

@zeripath but before this #9014 should be implemented ...

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Jan 18, 2020

I think it's a duplicate of #3880

@guillep2k
Copy link
Member Author

guillep2k commented Jan 18, 2020 •
edited
Loading

I think it's a duplicate of #3880

You're right. Closing this.

@zeripath
Copy link
Contributor

@6543 I suspect they might need each other

@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@lunny @techknowlogick @zeripath @guillep2k @6543