Actions: github/codeql-coding-standards
Actions
      214 workflow runs
    
  
          214 workflow runs
        
    M3-4-1: Incorrectly computes scope for template variables and constexpr variables
          
        
      
        🏁 Run Release Performance Check
        #1931:
        
            Issue comment #665 (comment)
            created
            by
              rak3-sh
              
        
      
      A1-1-2: does not understand -Wno-* flags
          
        
      
        🏁 Run Release Performance Check
        #1930:
        
            Issue comment #689 (comment)
            created
            by
              MichaelRFairhurst
              
        
      
      M3-4-1: Incorrectly computes scope for template variables and constexpr variables
          
        
      
        🏁 Run Release Performance Check
        #1928:
        
            Issue comment #665 (comment)
            created
            by
              lcartey
              
        
      
      M3-4-1: Incorrectly computes scope for template variables and constexpr variables
          
        
      
        🏁 Run Release Performance Check
        #1924:
        
            Issue comment #665 (comment)
            created
            by
              rak3-sh
              
        
      
      constexpr integer is used in array size
          
        
      
        🏁 Run Release Performance Check
        #1923:
        
            Issue comment #690 (comment)
            created
            by
              fjatWbyT
              
        
      
      M0-1-9:  constexpr used in array size is detected as dead code
          
        
      
        🏁 Run Release Performance Check
        #1922:
        
            Issue comment #678 (comment)
            created
            by
              fjatWbyT
              
        
      
      M0-1-9:  constexpr used in array size is detected as dead code
          
        
      
        🏁 Run Release Performance Check
        #1921:
        
            Issue comment #678 (comment)
            created
            by
              lcartey