Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Comparison with FastHTML #86

Open
hasansezertasan opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comparison with FastHTML #86

hasansezertasan opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@hasansezertasan
Copy link

Can we add a new column to the comparison table in the README for FastHTML?

I would also like to know what you think about FastHTML and the differences between FastHTML and Ludic.
@paveldedik
Copy link
Member

Thank you for the issue. I'll add it to the comparison table. it looks very similar to Ludic :) but I still like Ludic's API a bit more. It was created about two months ago, I wonder if the authors got some inspiration from Ludic.

@paveldedik paveldedik added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@paveldedik @hasansezertasan