Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

formatting of formulae and related styles within an entry - diffrences between published document and staging site #209

Open
ReesePlews opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Pending To be discussed later question Further information is requested

Comments

@ReesePlews
Copy link
Contributor

for this term blackbody radiance

the published PDF entry looks like this:

image

while the staging site entry looks like this:

image

i know the reason for this comes from my original input file (excel worksheet) and there being few or no CR/LFs in the text.
i am not saying we need to fix this now, but i wanted to point this out for future consideration.

do you think there will be a way to handle this when glossarist begins working with the terminology repository, such as using asciidoc in the content which could enable correctly formatted entries or having glossarist encode this content in a different way?

@ReesePlews ReesePlews added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Mar 28, 2024
@HassanAkbar
Copy link
Member

@ReesePlews Currently, there is no way to add line breaks into the text.

@ronaldtse We are just adding the concept definition in the page and escapes them so even if there are some elements in it they won't alter the styling of the definition.
Will have to look into it further for a solution.

@ReesePlews
Copy link
Contributor Author

understood. thank you @HassanAkbar for considering this. lets close or move this to some other area and we can revisit it when we think about how glossarist will handle this in the future.

@ReesePlews ReesePlews added the Pending To be discussed later label Apr 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Pending To be discussed later question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants