Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

landuse=cemetery gets no_feature_tag_ways #39

Open
matkoniecz opened this issue Jan 10, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

landuse=cemetery gets no_feature_tag_ways #39

matkoniecz opened this issue Jan 10, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@matkoniecz
Copy link

matkoniecz commented Jan 10, 2022

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846950041

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846953062 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846952375

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=cemetery?uselang=en

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/hdyc-osmi-issues?uid=1722488

  1. | WAY | 846950041 | tagging | no_feature_tag_ways (?) | 2021-02-08 23:47:54 | 98935750
    -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
  2. | WAY | 846952375 | tagging | no_feature_tag_ways (?) | 2021-02-08 23:43:28 | 98934892
  3. | WAY | 846953062 | tagging | no_feature_tag_ways (?) | 2021-02-08 23:43:30 | 98934892
@sekerob
Copy link

sekerob commented Oct 21, 2023

Just an observation. touching many a cemetery adding walls which are 100% over here, landuse=cemetery is fine, only once had an issue with a pet cemetery that I can recollect. It could be the combo that sets this off. Found few days ago that area:highway=residential is OK, but when attaching a name it gives this same no feature issue. In your case the common seems the supplemental tag of cemetery=war_cemetery. Remove it and wait 24 hours for the report update to confirm.

PS Remembered, we have a big Canadian war cemetery south of Ortona with same tags but its defined as a multipolygon. Had same issue few years ago per the CS comment until changing it to a multipolygon. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13454179

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Author

Remove it and wait 24 hours for the report update to confirm.

This tag is correct. I see no reason to remove valid tags

@sekerob
Copy link

sekerob commented Oct 21, 2023

If you don't want to test to narrow this down near 2 years after the report, up to you.

@matkoniecz
Copy link
Author

Testing in production is not acceptable, damaging real data is not acceptable.

If this repository has unit tests I would be happy to make a pull request. If that QA tool is running a test version using dev server I would be happy to make test cases there.

I will not vandalise OSM data to test how exactly this unsupported and abandoned software is broken.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants