You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! In my use case I see a need (sometime in future) to add possibility for users to customize the workflow. Ignoring some states is easy enough by conditional transitions. The question is about adding custom states.
Based on #55 and #92 I see that it should be possible to dynamically create a workflow specification and then inject it where it's needed via assign_workflow. On top of that I assume it should be possibile to add some customization via meta-programming (instance_eval and similar magic).
If I come to a point when I'll need to add such feature and if I find it's much easier to modify library itself then to manage such code on application side, would you accept such PR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! In my use case I see a need (sometime in future) to add possibility for users to customize the workflow. Ignoring some states is easy enough by conditional transitions. The question is about adding custom states.
Based on #55 and #92 I see that it should be possible to dynamically create a workflow
specification
and then inject it where it's needed viaassign_workflow
. On top of that I assume it should be possibile to add some customization via meta-programming (instance_eval
and similar magic).If I come to a point when I'll need to add such feature and if I find it's much easier to modify library itself then to manage such code on application side, would you accept such PR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: