You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I have been feeding a very simple dataset composed of consecutive ints to all GANs available in this library. The data is generated as follows, and stored in the oracle file.
X = [list(range(20))] * 80
I then attempt to perform a training on real data, using this file in input. Seqgan, Leakgan, Rankgan, Mle and Maligan manage to learn and reproduce this simple pattern.
The generator of GSGAN is able to restrict its vocabulary to the one given in input (i.e. use only integers between 0 and 20 instead of 0 and 5000), but is not able to capture the ordering.
The generator of TextGAN is neither able to restrict its vocabulary to the one given in input, nor able to learn an ordering.
As a result, the nll-test for these models is far from the one reached by the other models. Any hint on what may be causing this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As a possible direction, I observed that feeding two identical test samples to the generator of GSGAN resulted in two different losses. This is not the case for SeqGAN, MaliGAN, MLE and RankGAN.
Hi,
I have been feeding a very simple dataset composed of consecutive ints to all GANs available in this library. The data is generated as follows, and stored in the oracle file.
I then attempt to perform a training on real data, using this file in input. Seqgan, Leakgan, Rankgan, Mle and Maligan manage to learn and reproduce this simple pattern.
The generator of GSGAN is able to restrict its vocabulary to the one given in input (i.e. use only integers between 0 and 20 instead of 0 and 5000), but is not able to capture the ordering.
The generator of TextGAN is neither able to restrict its vocabulary to the one given in input, nor able to learn an ordering.
As a result, the nll-test for these models is far from the one reached by the other models. Any hint on what may be causing this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: