Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(gatsby-google-tagmanager): Update README #20392

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2020

Conversation

endymion1818
Copy link
Contributor

Description

I just came across this issue where our cookie consent manager was not able to withhold cookies based on consent because it was initiated using our gtm container; by swapping the order of the analytics plugin and gtm plugin in gatsby-config.js, I was able to resolve the issue.

I just came across this issue where our cookie consent manager was not able to withhold cookies based on consent because it was initiated using our gtm container; by swapping the order of the analytics plugin and gtm plugin in gatsby-config.js, I was able to resolve the issue.
@endymion1818 endymion1818 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 3, 2020 10:56
@LekoArts LekoArts changed the title gatsby-google-tagmanager update readme chore(gatsby-google-tagmanager): Update README Jan 8, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@LekoArts LekoArts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 👍

@LekoArts LekoArts added the bot: merge on green Gatsbot will merge these PRs automatically when all tests passes label Jan 8, 2020
@gatsbybot gatsbybot merged commit 0c70f43 into master Jan 8, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the endymion1818-gtm-readme-udpate branch January 8, 2020 10:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot: merge on green Gatsbot will merge these PRs automatically when all tests passes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants