You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have multiple artix a35t with different packages. Using the chipdb, produces by following build/demo instructions, for arty fails with a cmod A7 (different package size). This failure seems logical.
But my question is to know if it's possible to have one chipdb (here xc7a35t.bin) containing definitions for both xc7a35tcsg324-1 and xc7a35tcpg236-1 or if I have to create one .bin per model/size/package.
For a flow using a Makefile or a shell script: using the full device name isn't a issue but with tools like LiteX or amaranth a workaround/fix is required: chipdb is searched using device name instead of full definition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have multiple artix a35t with different packages. Using the chipdb, produces by following build/demo instructions, for arty fails with a cmod A7 (different package size). This failure seems logical.
But my question is to know if it's possible to have one chipdb (here
xc7a35t.bin
) containing definitions for bothxc7a35tcsg324-1
andxc7a35tcpg236-1
or if I have to create one .bin per model/size/package.For a flow using a
Makefile
or a shell script: using the full device name isn't a issue but with tools likeLiteX
oramaranth
a workaround/fix is required: chipdb is searched using device name instead of full definition.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: