Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make Kappa More Usable as a Library #81

Open
Miserlou opened this issue Aug 2, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Make Kappa More Usable as a Library #81

Miserlou opened this issue Aug 2, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@Miserlou
Copy link

Miserlou commented Aug 2, 2016

I'm now using Kappa as a dependency in Zappa, but this requires from fairly ugly hacking: https://github.com/Miserlou/Zappa/blob/master/zappa/util.py#L97 This may be too much to ask for, but there are few places where it'd be really great if Kappa acted a bit more like a library and less like a client.

Specifically, the ability to pass in our own Id and LambdaArns rather than them being generated , and returning responses in addition to logging where possible. That - and comments in the code, please!

Anyway, this might be a stretch but I figure I'd ask anyway. Thanks for all the great work!

@josegonzalez
Copy link
Contributor

Would you be interested making a pull request to implement that?

@Miserlou
Copy link
Author

Miserlou commented Aug 3, 2016

Yeah, for sure!

Is there a time line for the next Kappa version being released to PypI? We developed against -develop branch, but using the git branch in our build system is actually calling a few problems - would love to have develop branch merged back into master and published as soon as possible, if that's reasonable! :)

@josegonzalez
Copy link
Contributor

I can probably do that now? I more or less make releases when people remind me to.

@josegonzalez
Copy link
Contributor

Released.

@Miserlou
Copy link
Author

Another release, please? #80 has been merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants