Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Properly Enable Accelerated Networking for AvSet Clusters #101

Open
vpnachev opened this issue May 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Properly Enable Accelerated Networking for AvSet Clusters #101

vpnachev opened this issue May 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
area/performance Performance (across all domains, such as control plane, networking, storage, etc.) related area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure

Comments

@vpnachev
Copy link
Member

How to categorize this issue?

/area performance
/area quality
/kind enhancement
/priority normal
/platform azure

What would you like to be added:
Recently Accelerated Networking was enabled with #65. The decision to enable it or not was based only on the VM type and OS, but this caused troubles with AvSet clusters - basically the migration to VMs with enabled Accelerated Networking is requiring all non-enabled VMs to be deleted before new ones are created. If this is not done, VM creation is failing with ExistingAvailabilitySetWasNotDeployedOnAcceleratedNetworkingEnabledCluster, thus we disabled Accelerated Networking with #100 for all AvSet based shoot clusters.

Once #61 is implemented, we can use AvSet per machine class which will allow us to properly enable Accelerated Networking for non-zoned clusters, again.

Why is this needed:
See #55
@vpnachev vpnachev added the kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension label May 30, 2020
@ghost ghost added area/performance Performance (across all domains, such as control plane, networking, storage, etc.) related area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure priority/normal labels May 30, 2020
@vpnachev vpnachev mentioned this issue May 30, 2020
Merged
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) label Jul 30, 2020
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) and removed lifecycle/stale Nobody worked on this for 6 months (will further age) labels Sep 28, 2020
@dkistner dkistner mentioned this issue Dec 8, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/performance Performance (across all domains, such as control plane, networking, storage, etc.) related area/quality Output qualification (tests, checks, scans, automation in general, etc.) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lifecycle/rotten Nobody worked on this for 12 months (final aging stage) platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@vpnachev @gardener-robot