Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
That's interesting! But IMHO the original logo is also not ugly ;) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I landed here because the current logo doesn't play well with dark theme since the background was removed c1ca05d Personally, I think the telephone image may be too antiquated in technological terms. I thought a Venn diagram would be more applicable: The green line that connects the intersection with the "Bridge" label is supposed to separate the "Flutter" and "Rust" labels, but the word "Flutter" is a bit long when using the same font (Roboto Mono) size as the rest of the labels. This more compact design would better serve as a favicon in the docs as well: I'm not too confident about using the green color ( Tip You can opt-in to GitHub's Command palette to quickly switch the site's theme on demand. This allows to see how the above logo displays in either light or dark themes. Here's my WIP GIMP file I used to create the above images: FRB_logo.zip And now for the legalese
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@temeddix We should be careful when using AI to generate images for branding. Currently, most of the AI tools available to us do/may not respect copyright or trademark laws. While this isn't the end-users' problem, it could mean an unforeseen legal action taken against end-users in the future. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Currently, the logo is only a telephone between a Rust crab and Flutter bird. Wouldn't it be nice to have an official logo like this?
Disclaimer: This was drawn by midjourney AI
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions